Luna – News Journos

Luna and Johnson Reach Agreement on Remote Voting for New Parents

News Editor — Tue, 08 Apr 2025 04:40:51 +0000

This article is published by News Journos

In a recent political development, House Speaker Mike Johnson reached an agreement with Representative Anna Paulina Luna, who is advocating for new parents to have the option to vote remotely. This initiative, however, had previously stalled legislative activities within the House, prompting concerns about delays in addressing key votes tied to the agenda of former President Donald Trump. The situation reflects ongoing debates about voting access and legislative procedure, with implications for new parents and their representation in Congress.

On the operational front, the proposed solution involved a method called vote pairing, where absent members can partner with present members to effect a voting outcome without directly tallying their votes. While proponents herald this as a means to facilitate participation in democracy, critics argue it undermines the voting process. As discussions continue, both supporters and opponents remain vocal about their stances, potentially influencing broader legislative priorities this week.

Article Subheadings
1) Background on the Remote Voting Proposal
2) The Vote Pairing Agreement Explained
3) Reaction from Political Leaders
4) Implications for Legislative Priorities
5) The Ongoing Debate Over Voting Accessibility

Background on the Remote Voting Proposal

The remote voting initiative, chiefly promoted by Representative Brittany Pettersen from Colorado, was introduced earlier this year. The proposal aims to empower new parents by allowing them to designate another member to vote on their behalf for a period of twelve weeks following the birth of their child. This framework could be extended in cases where a lawmaker faces significant health issues or travel restrictions, thus ensuring that the voices of new parents are not silenced during critical legislative decisions.

Advocates of the proposal contend that accommodating the needs of new parents is essential for a representative democracy, especially as the requirements of modern family life often intersect with a lawmaker’s duties. In her advocacy, Luna has emphasized the importance of including provisions for various circumstances, including emergencies that might prevent members from casting their votes in person. The initiative captures the attention of various advocacy groups urging lawmakers to embrace more flexible voting measures.

The Vote Pairing Agreement Explained

In lieu of enabling full-scale remote voting, Speaker Mike Johnson and Luna agreed upon a vote pairing arrangement designed to allow absence voting through a procedural workaround. Under this system, a present member could cast a vote that counters the absent member’s intended vote. Subsequently, the present member would withdraw their vote and publicly announce that they are “pairing” with the absent member. Although this does not markedly alter the official vote tally, it allows for transparency, as both votes are recorded in the Congressional Record.

Critics of this arrangement claim it still does not adequately address the needs of new parents, as it maintains a framework that necessitates the physical presence of a voting member for a valid vote. Pettersen has pointed out that while the agreement represents progress, many barriers remain unaddressed by this limited solution. However, Johnson has claimed that the agreement is a necessary measure to alleviate concerns and allow continued legislative function.

Reaction from Political Leaders

The political landscape surrounding the remote voting proposal has sparked various reactions from leaders within both parties. Following the recent developments, Hakeem Jeffries, the House Minority Leader, expressed his metaphoric bewilderment at the opposition to allowing new parents the ability to vote. He described this resistance as “a strange hill to die on,” seeking to highlight the absurdity of any argument against facilitating parental participation in governance.

On the contrary, the context of the discussions has exposed differing philosophies within the Republican Party, particularly concerning issues of voting logistics and representation. Between Johnson’s insistence on the legality of voting methods and Pettersen’s stark criticisms, the dynamic reflects deeper ideological divides that influence legislative procedures and priorities. Moreover, Trump’s endorsement of remote voting for new parents further complicates the narrative by exposing Republican discomfort over party alignment versus public sentiment.

Implications for Legislative Priorities

The ability of House leaders to navigate through the contentious issue of remote voting could significantly dictate the legislative agenda expected to prevail in coming days. The situation reveals a critical junction, where both the remote voting process and procedural measures like vote pairing might obstruct or expedite significant legislation. As the House prepares to address various issues, including a Republican budget blueprint poised to be subject to vote, the ramifications of the remote voting initiative may echo through many essential legislative actions.

Ahead of this planned legislative activity, many lawmakers and analysts will be observing how the outcomes of these debates shape operational capacity within the House. As negotiations over procedural measures continue, the delicate balance between accommodating the needs of individual members while adhering to traditional voting practices will be a defining element in shaping the legislative landscape.

The Ongoing Debate Over Voting Accessibility

The controversy surrounding the vote pairing initiative underscores broader conversations around voting accessibility. Various stakeholders have expressed their concerns related to whether current legislative practices sufficiently understand and cater to the needs of all members of Congress, especially those who face unique hardships, such as new parents. The ongoing dialogue is not merely about this one instance but reflects a significant movement toward the modernization of congressional processes in alignment with contemporary societal needs.

Advocates for enhanced voting access argue that measures should be put in place to ensure diverse representation is maintained, facilitating a more inclusive democracy. The discourse surrounding this issue is layered, engaging practical, legal, and ethical implications that lawmakers will need to address moving forward. As representatives continue to debate the effectiveness of the current arrangements, there remains a consensus that evolving methodologies will be crucial for future legislative development.

No.	Key Points
1	House Speaker Mike Johnson reaches a vote pairing agreement with Anna Paulina Luna.
2	The proposal aims to allow new parents to vote remotely during critical family circumstances.
3	Critics argue that the vote pairing method falls short in ensuring adequate representation for absent members.
4	The outcome of this debate may influence the legislative priorities and operational capabilities of Congress.
5	The ongoing discussions about voting accessibility reflect broader trends in modernizing congressional practices.

Summary

In conclusion, the recent developments regarding remote voting options for new parents illustrate both the complexities involved in legislative processes and the potential for advocacy to initiate changes within Congress. While the agreement reached may represent progress for some, it simultaneously highlights systemic issues and raises critical questions about accessibility in voting. As the Congressional leadership prepares for upcoming votes, the discourse surrounding this initiative could reshape future legislative engagements and provoke further examination of how institutional norms must adapt to changing societal expectations.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What is the main objective of the proposed remote voting initiative?

The main objective is to enable new parents to designate another member to vote on their behalf for a specified period after childbirth, thus ensuring their representation in Congress during significant family transitions.

Question: What does vote pairing entail?

Vote pairing allows an absent member to partner with a present member, where the present member’s vote effectively counters that of the absent one, without adding to the overall vote total, thereby maintaining a record of both positions.

Question: Why is the remote voting issue significant in current legislative discussions?

The remote voting issue is significant as it raises broader questions about the accessibility of representation within Congress, highlighting the need for modernized processes that reflect contemporary family needs and challenges faced by lawmakers.

Luna Intensifies Proxy Voting Dispute with House GOP Leadership

News Editor — Tue, 01 Apr 2025 18:05:08 +0000

This article is published by News Journos

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, a Republican from Florida, is advocating for a new measure that would allow new parents in Congress to cast votes remotely for up to 12 weeks following the birth of their child. This legislative proposal, introduced as a “privileged resolution,” has drawn significant attention as it pits Luna against House GOP leaders who have expressed opposition to the bill. With political tension brewing, Luna’s initiative highlights the challenges faced by lawmakers who wish to balance personal commitments with legislative duties.

Article Subheadings
1) Introduction of the Proxy Voting Measure
2) Political Dynamics and Opposition
3) Luna’s Response to Leadership
4) Scope of the Proposed Legislation
5) Implications for Future Legislation

Introduction of the Proxy Voting Measure

The recent initiative introduced by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna proposes allowing new parents serving in Congress to vote via proxy for a period of up to 12 weeks after the birth of their child. This proposal was presented as a “privileged resolution” on a Tuesday, setting off a chain of events that have underscored the often-contentious nature of legislative procedures in the House. Recognizing the challenges that new parents in Congress face, particularly in balancing family responsibilities with their duties, Luna’s bill aims to provide them with the necessary flexibility to participate in legislative processes during this crucial period.

The resolution has garnered significant attention, as it navigates the intricate rules of Congress and the various opinions within the Republican Party. A resolution classified as “privileged” typically requires the House to address it within two legislative days, thus potentially forcing a vote that could alter existing norms regarding parental involvement in Congress. Luna’s legislative proposal is not just a singular issue; it flags the broader conversation about work-life balance and the need for legislative bodies to adapt to the evolving needs of their members.

Political Dynamics and Opposition

Despite the potential benefits of Luna’s proposal, it has met with considerable opposition from some factions within the GOP. Party leadership appears to have formed a coalition against the measure, with discussions reportedly including plans to diminish the resolution’s impact by adding language to an unrelated package of bills being considered by the House Rules Committee. Congressional dynamics often reflect the party’s internal disagreements, and this situation is no exception.

The response from House GOP leaders has highlighted a broader strategic concern; they are concerned about the implications of allowing proxy votes specifically for new parents. Some influential Republicans have classified proxy voting itself as “unconstitutional,” a point amplified by comments from Speaker Mike Johnson during closed-door meetings. Johnson articulated a view that extending proxy voting for a specific subset of lawmakers could lead to a slippery slope, challenging the foundational principles of congressional representation.

Additionally, this opposition underscores the delicate balancing act that exists within the party, as moderate Republicans are concerned about potential backlash from more conservative members should they be perceived as supportive of legislation that could enable proxy voting. This discord suggests that the fight over Luna’s resolution symbolizes deeper ideological divides, casting uncertainty on its immediate future.

Luna’s Response to Leadership

In light of the opposition, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna has not shied away from expressing her discontent with the current party leadership. She accused conservative factions of effectively holding Speaker Mike Johnson “hostage,” a sentiment she conveyed in a letter to fellow House Republicans. Luna’s frustrations culminated in her decision to resign from the House Freedom Caucus, citing a breakdown of trust and cooperation among its members.

In her resignation announcement, Luna voiced her dissatisfaction with specific behaviors within the caucus that she felt undermined its core values. She criticized the “backroom deals” that reportedly took place, suggesting that some members prioritized personal political interests over collective goals and values. Luna’s approach to being more vocal about her dissent signals a willingness to push back against traditional party lines in favor of more personal and family-oriented policies, a move that could resonate with voters who feel similarly sidelined.

Scope of the Proposed Legislation

The essence of Luna’s proposal is to enhance the participation of new parents, thus reflecting a more inclusive legislative environment. By allowing proxy voting for up to 12 weeks post-childbirth, Luna seeks to alleviate some of the pressures that lawmakers experience during crucial family moments. Under this legislation, both new mothers and fathers serving in Congress would have access to vote remotely, allowing them to manage their new responsibilities while still fulfilling their congressional duties.

This proposal showcases a growing recognition of the importance of family support structures not only in personal lives but also within the political sphere. The legislation is co-led by Rep. Brittney Pettersen, a Democrat from Colorado, indicating a possible bipartisan effort towards legislative reform in this area. The discussion surrounding this legislation can catalyze a national conversation about parental leave policies and their implementation at various levels of government, thereby influencing broader social norms across the board.

Implications for Future Legislation

The eventual outcome of Luna’s bill may carry significant implications for future legislative initiatives relating to parental rights and responsibilities within Congress. If passed, it may set a precedent for more flexible voting measures tailored to accommodate family needs, thereby fostering a more diverse and representative legislative body. Such changes could encourage not only parental involvement but also attract a broader array of candidates to run for congressional seats, potentially increasing the diversity of experiences and backgrounds represented in Congress.

However, the ongoing contention surrounding this resolution may also deter similar proposals in the future, particularly if the leadership remains staunchly opposed to alterations of established practices. The tensions displayed in recent developments suggest that the fight for parental rights inside Congress could be part of a larger trend, reflective of increasing advocacy for work-life balance in other professional sectors as well. The implications touch on fundamental aspects of how lawmakers perceive their dual roles as both public servants and caregivers.

No.	Key Points
1	Rep. Anna Paulina Luna proposed a measure allowing new parents to vote remotely for 12 weeks post-birth.
2	GOP leadership has expressed opposition to proxy voting, labeling it as unconstitutional.
3	Luna resigned from the House Freedom Caucus citing internal dissent and power struggles.
4	Her bill aims to facilitate greater participation among new parents within Congress.
5	The measure could set a precedent for future family-focused legislation in Congress.

Summary

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna is at the forefront of a significant legislative push aimed at providing new parents in Congress with remote voting capabilities. While her proposal reflects a progressive approach to accommodating family responsibilities, it has also ignited tension within the GOP. As the legislative journey unfolds, it remains to be seen how this initiative will affect the broader dialogue about parental rights and representation in government, alongside the potential for inciting further divisions within the party.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What is the purpose of Luna’s proposed resolution?

Luna’s proposed resolution seeks to allow new parents serving in Congress to vote by proxy for up to 12 weeks following the birth of their child, thereby supporting work-life balance.

Question: What opposition has Luna faced regarding her proposal?

Luna’s proposal has faced opposition from some GOP leaders who question the legality of proxy voting and have expressed concerns about its implications for congressional practice.

Question: What does Luna’s resignation from the Freedom Caucus signify?

Luna’s resignation from the House Freedom Caucus signifies a rift between her and certain conservative factions within the GOP, highlighting internal conflicts regarding effective leadership and support for family-oriented policies.

Rep. Luna Exits House Freedom Caucus Over Remote Voting Controversy for New Mothers

News Editor — Tue, 01 Apr 2025 06:55:42 +0000

This article is published by News Journos

In a significant move within Congress, Republican Rep. Anna Paulina Luna of Florida has resigned from the House Freedom Caucus. This decision comes amidst a contentious debate regarding the possibility of allowing new parents to vote remotely during newborn care. The proposed measure, which aims to permit representatives to designate a voting proxy for up to 12 weeks after childbirth, has faced considerable opposition from House leadership, culminating in internal strife within the Republican caucus.

Article Subheadings
1) The Remote Voting Controversy
2) Luna’s Resignation Explained
3) Opposition from House Leadership
4) Implications for Legislative Procedure
5) Response from Democratic Leadership

The Remote Voting Controversy

The debate surrounding remote voting in Congress has gained momentum, particularly following proposals by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna to allow new parents to utilize proxy voting for up to 12 weeks post-birth. This measure aims to accommodate new parents, enabling them to fulfill their responsibilities while managing the demands of childcare. Traditionally, members of Congress have been required to be present to cast votes, but there have been growing calls for a more flexible approach.

The challenges of balancing family needs with congressional duties are increasingly recognized among lawmakers. Proponents of the proxy voting legislation argue that the current system is outdated, particularly in light of evolving workplace norms and the challenges new parents face. By allowing a temporary voting proxy, Congress could demonstrate its commitment to supporting families, reflecting broader societal changes toward parental leave and childcare responsibilities.

Luna’s Resignation Explained

In a letter addressed to her colleagues, Rep. Luna expressed her deep disappointment in the recent actions of the House Freedom Caucus, resulting in her decision to resign. She characterized the behavior of her colleagues as a betrayal of trust, particularly as they threatened House Speaker Mike Johnson with halting floor proceedings unless he took steps to block her discharge petition regarding the proxy voting measure.

Luna’s resignation highlights not only her frustration but also the fragmentation within the Republican Party on this issue. In her letter, she emphasized that she could no longer remain a member of a caucus that did not support a necessary and humane policy for new parents, suggesting that internal party dynamics might be stifling important discussions. Luna’s departure marks a potential shift towards more progressive supports for family-related legislative changes within a traditionally conservative caucus.

Opposition from House Leadership

House Speaker Mike Johnson has been a vocal opponent of the proposed proxy voting measure, arguing that it is unconstitutional and undermines the voting integrity of the House. His resistance follows a broader trend observed since Republicans regained control of the House, during which they reinstated rules that disallow proxy voting that had been temporarily implemented during the pandemic. Johnson’s stance underscores the ideological divide that characterizes current congressional voting practices.

Moreover, the efforts to suppress Luna’s proposal indicate a deeper conflict within the party about how to manage new legislative ideas in the context of traditional Republican values. While some members seek to modernize Congress to be more inclusive and accommodating, others adhere strictly to established norms that prioritize physical presence to vote. This tension could have implications not just for Luna and her allies, but for broader legislative practices moving forward.

Implications for Legislative Procedure

The debate around the proxy voting measure is set against a backdrop of procedural challenges that could affect other legislative priorities. As discussion surrounding new rules intensifies, the possibility exists that the current leadership will strategically attach language within unrelated legislation—such as the proof of citizenship requirement for voter registration—to minimize the likelihood of any votes concerning Luna’s proposal.

This approach demonstrates a tactical maneuver by leadership to circumvent dissenting opinions while asserting control over the legislative agenda. Observers may see this as indicative of a broader strategy employed by the Republican majority to silence opposition and maintain cohesion within their ranks, particularly on contentious issues that could potentially fracture support within the party.

Response from Democratic Leadership

Democrats have seized upon the unfolding conflict over the proxy vote proposal as an opportunity to critique Republican leadership on various fronts. Rep. Jim McGovern, the top Democrat on the House Rules Committee, highlighted concerns over the authenticity of procedural processes being used to derail Luna’s initiative. He queried the rationale behind presenting an election security bill alongside regulations aimed at limiting proxy voting, suggesting that the purpose was indeed to stifle Luna’s discharge petition.

By framing the situation in this light, Democrats aim to spotlight what they view as a failure of leadership to engage constructively with bipartisan measures that would benefit families in Congress. The contrasting narratives from Democrats and Republicans illustrate the ongoing battle for political authority and influence over legislative priorities as they intersect with fundamental family issues in the modern era.

No.	Key Points
1	Rep. Anna Paulina Luna resigned from the House Freedom Caucus due to internal conflicts over remote voting.
2	Luna proposed allowing new parents to vote via proxy for 12 weeks post-birth.
3	House Speaker Mike Johnson opposes remote voting, labeling it unconstitutional.
4	Internal party dynamics appear to be stifling progressive measures among Republican members.
5	Democratic leaders have criticized Republican maneuvers as tactics to block meaningful changes in family-supportive legislation.

Summary

The recent resignation of Rep. Anna Paulina Luna from the House Freedom Caucus underscores a growing rift within the Republican Party regarding issues of family support and legislative innovation. Her proposals for remote voting reflect broader societal shifts and the need for congressional policies to adapt to the realities of modern parenthood. As the controversy unfolds, it may not only shape future legislative actions but also influence party dynamics in a crucial election year.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What prompted Rep. Luna’s resignation from the House Freedom Caucus?

Rep. Luna resigned in response to internal conflicts over her proposal for new parents to have the ability to vote remotely, which faced opposition from House leadership.

Question: What are the main points of the proxy voting proposal?

The proposal aims to allow new parents in Congress to designate a colleague to vote on their behalf for up to 12 weeks following childbirth, as well as allowing the period to start earlier under certain medical conditions.

Question: How has House leadership responded to the proxy voting proposal?

House Speaker Mike Johnson has publicly opposed the proxy voting measure, suggesting it is unconstitutional and indicating intentions to block its progress through legislative maneuvers.

Anna Paulina Luna Exits House Freedom Caucus Amid Proxy Voting Dispute

News Editor — Tue, 01 Apr 2025 06:40:26 +0000

This article is published by News Journos

In a significant political move, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, a Republican from Florida, has announced her resignation from the House Freedom Caucus. This decision comes amid rising tensions within the GOP over the issue of proxy voting. Luna has expressed her frustration with party dynamics, particularly regarding her push for legislation that would allow new parents to vote remotely for a period of 12 weeks following the birth of their child. Her exit highlights deeper rifts among House conservatives and raises questions about unity as congressional priorities shift.

Article Subheadings
1) Luna Resigns from House Freedom Caucus
2) Background on Proxy Voting Proposal
3) Reactions from GOP Leadership
4) Implications for House Freedom Caucus
5) The Path Forward for Current Legislation

Luna Resigns from House Freedom Caucus

On a recent day in Washington D.C., Rep. Anna Paulina Luna formally announced her resignation from the House Freedom Caucus, a coalition of right-leaning Republicans. This move was shared through a letter addressed to her colleagues and signals a marked change in her relationship with the party. Luna, who has been vocal about her efforts to support family-oriented legislation, denounced a culture within the caucus that she claims undermines the principles it stands for. Her resignation represents a pivotal moment, as she becomes the first member to leave the group during the current congressional session.

In her letter, Luna emphasized that mutual respect among colleagues had deteriorated, which ultimately led to her departure. “I cannot remain part of a caucus where a select few operate outside its guidelines,” she stated, indicating the internal conflicts that have escalated within the group. The other members of the Freedom Caucus may now have to navigate the challenges that arise from this fragmentation. With her resignation, Luna aims to redirect attention to issues affecting families, particularly as they navigate the responsibilities of new parenthood.

Background on Proxy Voting Proposal

Luna’s proposal for proxy voting stems from her recognition of the unique challenges faced by new parents in Congress. In a legislature where session attendance is crucial, she advocates for allowing those who have recently welcomed a child to participate in votes without being physically present. This initiative, she explains, is configured as a ‘discharge petition,’ which allows lawmakers to advance legislation to the floor despite opposition from leadership.

The timing of this proposal has been particularly crucial, given that it seeks to address the needs of a demographic that has historically seen limited representation within the halls of Congress. Luna pointed out that there have been fewer than 14 new mothers who have served in Congress throughout its history. Despite her well-intended efforts, opposition has been formidable, with several House conservatives working against her initiative during a recent vote on unrelated legislation.

Reactions from GOP Leadership

The announcement of Luna’s resignation from the caucus was met with various reactions from GOP leadership, particularly from Speaker Mike Johnson, who has expressed his reservations regarding the concept of proxy voting. During a weekly closed-door meeting, Johnson remarked that he finds proxy voting for new parents potentially unconstitutional. His comments illustrate the broader resistance among some Republican leaders to modify existing voting procedures.

In addition, Rep. Chip Roy of Texas, one of Luna’s former colleagues, voiced his opposition on social media. He argued that the implementation of such a rule could lead to misuse and create a slippery slope where other individuals, such as cancer patients or even those simply looking for convenience, might demand similar exemptions. The leadership’s firm stance has underscored divisions within the party, particularly regarding the balance between family support and maintaining the integrity of legislative processes.

Implications for House Freedom Caucus

Luna’s resignation raises questions about the future of the House Freedom Caucus and its cohesive agenda. The group has historically championed conservative values and legislative initiatives but is now faced with the challenge of maintaining unity amidst internal discord. Her departure reflects growing tensions and discontent among members that could hinder the caucus’s effectiveness moving forward.

Previously, several other members have also distanced themselves from the caucus. Notably, Reps. Warren Davidson of Ohio and Randy Weber of Texas were also recent departures who faced their own challenges within the group. Their exits signify an ongoing trend of fragmentation within the conservative faction of the House, prompting speculation about who else might follow suit in the coming months.

The Path Forward for Current Legislation

Looking ahead, the path for Luna’s proposed legislation remains uncertain. Currently, the House leadership’s resistance poses immediate hurdles for any measures aimed at reforming the conventional voting process. Luna’s initiative, designed to support the family needs of newly elected members, could face significant delays or even complete halt without broader party support.

Luna’s fight for proxy voting isn’t just about her proposal; it reflects larger trends within the GOP as it grapples with adopting contemporary practices that acknowledge modern family dynamics. The effectiveness of legislators is also under scrutiny, prompting calls to reconsider standards that prioritize attendance over accessibility in a rapidly changing society.

No.	Key Points
1	Rep. Anna Paulina Luna resigns from the House Freedom Caucus, citing internal conflicts over proxy voting.
2	Luna’s legislation aims to allow new parents to vote remotely for 12 weeks after a child’s birth.
3	GOP leadership, including Speaker Mike Johnson, opposes the proxy voting proposal, viewing it as potentially unconstitutional.
4	Luna’s resignation marks a trend of fragmentation within the House Freedom Caucus, raising questions about its unity.
5	The future of proxy voting legislation remains uncertain amid opposition from GOP leaders.

Summary

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna’s resignation from the House Freedom Caucus underscores growing tensions within the GOP regarding the subject of proxy voting for new parents. Her departure reveals a broader struggle within the party, reflecting conflicts between traditional legislative practices and evolving family needs. As the House navigates these issues, it will be critical to consider how they may impact bipartisan efforts and the overall effectiveness of governmental processes moving forward.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What is the purpose of Luna’s proxy voting proposal?

Luna’s proposal aims to allow new parents in Congress to vote remotely for 12 weeks following the birth of their child, recognizing the challenges they face in balancing family responsibilities with legislative duties.

Question: Why did Luna resign from the House Freedom Caucus?

Luna resigned due to internal strife within the caucus, feeling that the mutual respect and core values of the group had deteriorated, particularly in response to her efforts for proxy voting.

Question: How have GOP leaders reacted to the proposed legislation?

GOP leaders, including Speaker Mike Johnson, have expressed opposition to Luna’s proposal, citing concerns over constitutionality and potential misuse among members if proxy voting were to be implemented.