©2025 News Journos. All rights reserved.

A recent audit by the Court of Accounts has exposed troubling financial practices at the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA). The report highlights that funds earmarked for scientific research were misappropriated for personal purchases, including electronics, office items, and even non-scientific literature. With a budget of 135.5 million liras in 2023, the audit reveals potential misuse of taxpayer money that raises significant concerns about the accountability of public institutions.

Overview of Auditor’s Findings

The Court of Accounts has rigorously examined the financial dealings of TÜBA. The audit found that funds designated for scientific research had been diverted towards non-permissible personal purchases. This included a variety of items such as mobile phones, smartwatches, office desks, and chairs, which do not align with the intended use of the academy’s budget. Over a period of three years, 41 electronic devices were acquired by the academy, but not one was recorded as institutional assets. This raises alarms about accountability and adherence to the established financial guidelines that govern public institutions.

TÜBA, established in 1993 as a state-affiliated autonomous organization, is charged with conducting scientific reviews, supporting young researchers, and publishing scientific works. The audit indicated a total budget expenditure of 132.6 million liras out of the allocated 135.5 million liras for 2023, which presents serious discrepancies in how the budget is being managed. The findings have led to criticisms regarding the fiscal governance at TÜBA and pose questions about the oversight mechanisms currently in place.

TÜBA’s Justification for Expenditures

In reaction to the audit’s findings, TÜBA officials have defended the controversial purchases, asserting that these expenditures were indeed necessary for research purposes. They described the equipment and furniture as “essential” for adapting to the evolving demands of research in both natural and social sciences. The agency emphasized that in the context of technological advancements, the items procured were crucial for carrying out scientific activities.

Officials also asserted that the logistics of registering such purchases in the academy’s inventory were “practically impossible,” which raises further concerns about transparency. The lack of auditing and oversight may permit misuse of funds, leaving taxpayers questioning how their money is being utilized.

The Problem of Book Purchases

The misuse of funds extended beyond technology and furniture to include books purchased for research support. The audit revealed that many of these books were irrelevant to the researchers’ fields and had no scientific merit. Some of the volumes included self-help and classic fiction, which casts doubt on the academic rigor expected from an institution dedicated to scientific inquiry.

In its written defense to the Court of Accounts, TÜBA insisted that these purchases complied with existing regulations, but the audit emphasized a critical point: any books acquired under research support should be relevant and scientific in nature. The failure to adhere to this guideline further illustrates a troubling disconnect between the institution’s operations and its foundational mission.

Issues with Funding for Research Assistants

Another significant concern raised by the audit pertains to funding for research assistants. Payments were reportedly made based on self-declarations, lacking verification against official employment records. The Court of Accounts highlighted that service records from the Social Security Institution (SGK) were ignored in determining the eligibility of the assistants, which poses a risk of financial support reaching individuals who either do not work or have informal employment arrangements.

In defense of this practice, TÜBA maintained that the majority of these assistants were students engaged in intellectual activities rather than traditional employment roles. They argued that the nature of their tasks made it impractical to categorize them under standard employment regulations. However, auditors have pointed out that the lack of verification creates a vulnerability in the system, potentially leading to financial exploitation of the budget.

Implications of Misuse of Funds

The ongoing issues surrounding the misappropriation of funds at TÜBA raise critical implications for the governance of public institutions in Turkey. The financial irregularities undermine public trust and call attention to the possible need for legislative reform to enhance oversight mechanisms. The report’s findings may not only influence future budgeting decisions but could also prompt a broader conversation about the accountability of public agencies.

In addition, these developments raise questions about the effectiveness of existing regulations designed to safeguard taxpayer money. The emphasis on personal purchasing over essential research functionality suggests a systemic problem that could potentially affect the integrity of scientific research in Turkey.

Summary

The findings of the Court of Accounts regarding the Turkish Academy of Sciences spotlight critical issues concerning financial management and accountability within public institutions. The misuse of substantial funds intended for scientific research raises pressing questions about governance, oversight, and the integrity of scientific endeavors in Turkey. Addressing these concerns will be essential to restore public trust and ensure that future research funding is used appropriately to advance scientific inquiry.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What were the specific findings of the audit at TÜBA?

The audit revealed that funds allocated for research were misused for personal purchases, including electronics and books unrelated to scientific inquiry.

Question: How did TÜBA justify their expenditures?

Officials defended the purchases by stating that the items were essential for research activities, claiming compliance with regulations.

Question: What implications do the audit’s findings have for future funding?

The findings may prompt legislative reforms and a reassessment of oversight mechanisms to ensure responsible management of taxpayer funds.

©2025 News Journos. All rights reserved.

©2025 News Journos. All rights reserved.

A recent initiative titled “Thermal Walks,” organized by the Justice in Space Association (MAD) together with Istanbul’s Maltepe Municipality, aims to raise awareness about the impact of heatwaves in urban areas. This project, supported by the European Union, encourages local residents to participate in scientific data collection through citizen science methods. Conducted across four neighborhoods, the walks allow participants to track temperature and humidity while experiencing firsthand the effects of extreme heat, particularly during a recent heatwave that struck the city.

Overview of the Thermal Walks Initiative

The “Thermal Walks” initiative is part of a research project focusing on the dramatic effects of rising temperatures in urban environments. Started in January 2025 and set to conclude by the end of the year, the project is funded under the EU’s “Civil Participation Grant Program.” The involved organizations, particularly MAD and Maltepe Municipality, have aimed not only to gather scientific data but also to involve the local populace in the research process. The citizen science approach encourages community members to contribute to data collection, thereby making them active participants in discussions about climate resilience.

The first of several walks took place on June 28, 2025, synchronizing with a persistent heatwave that significantly affected Istanbul. Participants were equipped with tools to measure temperature and humidity at various points throughout the route, which spanned notable locations like Fatih Tarakçı Park and the İdealtepe 50th Year Grove. As reported by environmental specialists, this alignment of timing offered essential insights into the local climate crisis and the effects of heatwaves on daily living.

Participants and Community Involvement

The Küçükyalı walk drew a diverse group of participants, including MAD team members, local residents, and students from the Department of Urban and Regional Planning at Istanbul University. The initiative also saw involvement from graduate students across various universities, staff from Maltepe Municipality, and visiting researchers from international institutions like Erasmus University Rotterdam. These combinations not only enriched the data collection experience but also fostered a sense of community engagement and purpose.

Two core community groups were formed within this initiative: the facilitator community, composed mainly of university students, and the participant researcher community, which included residents, particularly women and seniors. These groups played vital roles in collecting observations and providing feedback, ensuring that the data reflected the realities faced by the community. The local neighborhood head, or muhtar, also participated to represent the community’s interests.

Feedback from participants has been generally positive, with many expressing appreciation for the collaborative effort between citizens and officials. However, there were mentions of the physically demanding nature of the morning walks, especially given the high-temperature conditions. The dynamic between scientific research and public participation became evident, proving that local engagement could significantly enhance policy-making related to environmental issues.

Key Findings and Observations

From the Küçükyalı route, it was noted that areas near the E-5 (D100 Highway) exhibited significantly higher temperatures compared to northern neighborhoods, highlighting urban heat islands within Istanbul. Additionally, while parks like the 50th Year Park provided essential cooling through shade and ventilation, playgrounds were found lacking necessary shaded areas, exposing children to potential heat risks.

A comparative analysis revealed similar challenges in various neighborhoods assessed, including:

• Zümrütevler: High temperatures attributed to dense construction and insufficient green spaces.
• Fındıklı: Narrow sidewalks with limited shade and exposed public transports stops posing discomfort for commuters.
• Altayçeşme: Inadequate pathways for pedestrians and a decline in mature trees due to urban renewal projects.

As such, a systemic lack of shade and greenery emerged as a pressing concern across all neighborhoods evaluated. The practical implications are dire, particularly for vulnerable populations facing health risks from extreme heat.

Significance of Citizen Science

MAD emphasizes that citizen science extends beyond merely a method for gathering data; it is a pivotal tool for empowering city residents. By involving them in environmental assessments, community members gain a voice regarding their living conditions. With the mantra “Nothing about us, without us!” resonating throughout the project, there are compelling implications for grassroots demands for policy changes. This approach strengthens community engagement, making it imperative for local governments to consider public input in planning and policies related to climate adaptation.

As specialists point out, the collaborative nature of citizen science can significantly enrich public discourse on climate resilience, encouraging local governments to form actionable solutions tailored to community needs.

Future Plans and Data Outlook

Moving forward, MAD plans to continue organizing Thermal Walks on various routes throughout the summer. Although most activities will remain concentrated in Maltepe, there are aspirations to expand these initiatives to additional districts. As stated by environmental experts, this ongoing research marks the start of much-needed dialogue about urban heat management and climate responsiveness in Istanbul.

Once the collected data is processed, it will be published on golgeleringucu.org, including comprehensive maps, reports, and thermal imagery. This transparency is expected to foster ongoing community engagement and encourage public interest in climate issues. To stay updated on progress and upcoming events, following the Justice in Space Association on social media is recommended.

Summary

The “Thermal Walks” initiative represents a significant step toward understanding and addressing the impacts of climate change within urban areas. Involving community members highlights the importance of citizen engagement in addressing environmental challenges. The project’s hands-on approach not only generates critical data but also fosters a collaborative environment where residents can contribute meaningfully to local climate policies. With plans for future expansions, this initiative holds promise for enhancing urban resilience and bolstering public awareness for climate action in Istanbul.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What are Thermal Walks?

Thermal Walks are community-led initiatives organized to collect data on urban heat conditions, encouraging local residents to observe and measure temperature and humidity in their neighborhoods.

Question: Who participated in the Thermal Walks?

Participants included local residents, students from various universities, municipal staff, and researchers, all engaging in the data collection process to understand urban heat better.

Question: What are the goals of the Thermal Walks initiative?

The initiative aims to raise awareness about the impact of heatwaves in urban areas, encouraging community involvement in scientific data collection and fostering discussions about climate resilience strategies.

©2025 News Journos. All rights reserved.

©2025 News Journos. All rights reserved.

In an exclusive interview, Michael Kratsios, the director of the White House Office of Science and Technology, discussed the United States’ strategy to maintain its dominance in artificial intelligence (AI) amidst rapidly advancing innovations from China. Kratsios, who previously served as chief technology officer under the Trump administration, emphasized the importance of a proactive approach to AI policy that balances innovation and regulation. He noted that while the U.S. currently leads in AI technology, the pace at which China is advancing poses a significant challenge to maintaining this leadership.

The Shift in U.S. AI Policy: A Review of Historical Context

The trajectory of U.S. policy regarding artificial intelligence shifted significantly during the Trump administration, primarily initiated by the signing of the first-ever executive order on AI in 2019. According to Kratsios, this marked a turning point where the U.S. began to redefine its national technology policy with the aspiration of maintaining leadership in advanced technologies, including AI, quantum computing, and 5G. The move was a direct response to the burgeoning interest in these technologies, which were rapidly becoming critical to national security and economic stability.

During the Trump era, Kratsios noted, there was a focus on establishing a strategic framework that sought to promote American interests in technological innovation. “The president recognized that it was critical for the U.S. to lead in AI,” Kratsios stated, reflecting on the efforts to engage various stakeholders—from government agencies to private industry—in a collective mission to propel AI advancements. This approach contrasted sharply with the subsequent Biden administration’s perspective, which he described as overly cautious and focused primarily on regulating potential harms associated with AI instead of fostering its benefits.

Current Landscape: U.S. Leadership in AI Technology

As it currently stands, the United States is perceived by many, including Kratsios, to be at the forefront of AI development across three primary components: semiconductor technology, AI models, and the practical applications arising from these innovations. Kratsios declared, “If you look at all three of those layers, the U.S. is the leader. We have the best chips. We have the best models. And we have the best applications to date.” This assertion reinforces the notion that U.S. capacities in AI technology are robust and capable of substantial impact.

However, the landscape is not without its challenges. The speed of innovation—particularly from Chinese companies—is a growing concern for U.S. policymakers. During the interview, Kratsios revealed that he is closely monitoring developments, including new products such as DeepSeek, which was introduced by a Chinese firm. This technology reportedly develops large language models that could threaten U.S. competitiveness if they are allowed to proliferate unchecked.

China’s Rapid Progress in AI: A Competitive Threat

One of the most pressing concerns outlined by Kratsios is the rapid acceleration of AI advancements in China. He pointed out that the Chinese government is significantly investing in AI technologies, which could quickly narrow the gap between the U.S. and its international rivals. “The speed at which the PRC is catching up with us is actually accelerating,” he cautioned. The implications of this technological race could reverberate across geopolitical landscapes, influencing everything from economic competitiveness to national security.

The potential consequences of China surpassing U.S. capabilities in AI are alarming. With state-sponsored surveillance technology and heavy investments in data-driven AI systems, the Chinese may leverage advancements for purposes that could lead to human rights violations or increased global influence through technological means. Kratsios emphasized the need for a strategic approach to counteract these threats while simultaneously enhancing U.S. capabilities in AI development.

Protecting U.S. Innovations: The Strategy Outlined by Kratsios

At the heart of the Trump administration’s strategy, as articulated by Kratsios, is the concept of “promote and protect.” This dual approach seeks to not only enhance U.S. innovation in AI but also mitigate risks associated with potential adversaries gaining access to sensitive technologies. “We protect that technology from access by the Chinese,” Kratsios stated, particularly highlighting the critical nature of high-end semiconductors that could empower China’s AI capabilities significantly.

The “promote” aspect of this strategy encourages domestic collaboration among various sectors to drive innovation. Kratsios emphasized the need to foster a culture of AI research and development that actively engages American entrepreneurs, researchers, and companies in the technological advancement race. Additionally, he hinted at the necessity of collaboration with foreign allies to maintain U.S. leadership while ensuring that these partners align with American values in AI technology and its applications.

Future Aspirations: The U.S. Vision for AI and Beyond

Looking to the future, Kratsios remains optimistic about the United States’ potential in AI innovation, framing this moment in history as a “golden age” for technological advancement. He envisions a future where American workers leverage AI to improve efficiency, reduce risk, and enhance productivity across various sectors. “We want AI to be used by American workers to allow them to do their jobs better, safer and faster,” he asserted.

Beyond immediate technological goals, Kratsios mentions ambitious aspirations, such as sending an American flag to Mars and making advancements in transportation technologies. He believes that the efforts of the White House will drive innovation and contribute significantly to the overall advancement of U.S. society through a clearer focus on AI possibilities.

Summary

In conclusion, Michael Kratsios provides insights into the U.S. approach that aims to secure its leadership in AI amidst challenges posed by rapid advancements from China. By balancing promotion of innovation with the protection of sensitive technologies, the administration seeks to ensure that the U.S. maintains its competitiveness in this crucial sector. The potential outcomes of these strategies could shape not only the technological landscape but also the broader geopolitical dynamics in the coming years.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What is the “promote and protect” strategy in U.S. AI policy?

The “promote and protect” strategy focuses on encouraging the development and application of AI technologies while safeguarding critical innovations from adversarial access, particularly concerning high-end semiconductors and sensitive information.

Question: How is China’s AI development perceived by U.S. officials?

U.S. officials view China’s AI development as a serious competitive threat, especially as China accelerates its technological advancements and invests heavily in surveillance technologies that could undermine U.S. interests.

Question: What are the future aspirations for AI in the United States?

The future aspirations include enhancing the efficiency and productivity of American workers through AI, promoting innovative projects like interplanetary exploration, and solidifying collaborations with allies to maintain technological leadership.

©2025 News Journos. All rights reserved.