Close Menu
News JournosNews Journos
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
Editors Picks

American Women Charged with Child Smuggling Attempt into the U.S.

April 11, 2025

Trump Accuses China of Trade Deal Violations Amid Tariff Threats

June 1, 2025

Trump Advocates Tax Increases for Wealthy Amid Upcoming Bill Deadline

May 9, 2025

Trump Administration Freezes Billions in Funding for After-School and Summer Programs

July 2, 2025

Migrant Influencer Deported After Promoting Illegal Squatting in U.S. Homes

March 31, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Latest Headlines:
  • Allegations of Sexual Abuse Against Female Students at Private School Prompt Outcry
  • North Carolina Named Top State for Business in 2025
  • Turkey Declines to Extend ‘Right to Hope’ to Öcalan in Council of Europe Communication
  • French University Invites American Researchers Facing Academic Cuts to Apply for “Scientific Asylum”
  • Inside the State Capitol: Law Enforcement and DNA Sharing on K-8 Campuses in California
  • Whistleblower Texts Reveal Trump Nominee Encouraged Defiance of Court Order
  • Musk Launches Grok 4 Update Following Controversial xAI Chatbot Remarks
  • Taiwan Enhances Defense with U.S. Tanks Amid Rising China Tensions
  • Columbia University Trustee Urges Board to Adhere to Trump Administration Requests
  • Southern Cities Set to Provide Top Rental Value for U.S. Renters in 2025
  • EU Commission Engages with X Over Grok’s Antisemitic Remarks
  • Republicans Divided Over Trump Proposal to Cut USAID and Public Broadcasting
  • China Foils Three Foreign Spy Plots, Including “Honey Trap” Scheme
  • Delta Air Lines Reports 2Q 2025 Earnings
  • Vanguard and BlackRock Unveil Strategies for Second Half of 2025
  • Using More Emojis in Texts Can Enhance Relationships
  • Supreme Court Considers State Restrictions on Transgender Athletes in Women’s Sports
  • Faroe Islands Introduce Secretive Travel Experiences
  • Defendants in Kartalkaya Case Shift Blame Among Themselves
  • Supreme Court Blocks Florida’s Enforcement of New Immigration Law Temporarily
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
News JournosNews Journos
Subscribe
Thursday, July 10
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
News JournosNews Journos
You are here: News Journos » Top Stories » Appeals Court Extends Order for Trump to Deploy National Guard to Los Angeles
Appeals Court Extends Order for Trump to Deploy National Guard to Los Angeles

Appeals Court Extends Order for Trump to Deploy National Guard to Los Angeles

News EditorBy News EditorJune 19, 2025 Top Stories 6 Mins Read

Washington — The ongoing legal battle concerning the deployment of California’s National Guard took a significant turn on Thursday when a federal appeals court extended a stay on a federal judge’s ruling that aimed to return control of the troops to Governor Gavin Newsom. The ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit allows approximately 4,000 National Guard members to continue their operations in Los Angeles, where they have been active in guarding federal property amidst rising tensions due to immigration enforcement actions. The situation raises important questions about the scope of presidential power and state authority.

Article Subheadings
1) Overview of the Legal Situation
2) Trump’s Invocation of Title 10
3) Reactions from State Officials
4) Historical Context of National Guard Deployments
5) Broader Implications of the Court’s Decision

Overview of the Legal Situation

The recent legal engagement revolves around the President’s authority to federalize the National Guard. During a pivotal court session, the 9th Circuit Court ruled unanimously to extend a stay on a lower court’s decision made by U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer last week. Judge Breyer had decreed that the Trump Administration had overstepped its legal authority in deploying California’s National Guard without the consent of state officials. In his ruling, he had ordered that control of the National Guard troops be returned to Governor Newsom.

The decision is significant as approximately 4,100 National Guard members and 700 active-duty Marines have been mobilized in Los Angeles to address rising tensions surrounding federal immigration enforcement operations. The 9th Circuit’s ruling reflected a balance of power, allowing the federal government to maintain its defense priorities while also illustrating the complexities of state versus federal oversight.

Trump’s Invocation of Title 10

One of the central elements of this saga is President Trump’s invocation of Title 10, a law that permits the President to federalize the National Guard during times of national disturbance. In a recent memorandum dated June 7, Trump claimed the protests against immigration raids constituted a “form of rebellion.” His administration argued that federal action was necessary to protect critical infrastructure, including a federal immigration detention facility in Los Angeles. By invoking Title 10, Trump aimed to bolster his administration’s stance on immigration enforcement and counteract the protests occurring in response to his policies.

During the proceedings, confident assertions from the Justice Department established that the President has considerable discretion to federalize National Guard troops in situations deemed necessary for public safety and law enforcement. The 9th Circuit judges noted that the administration had a reasonable basis for invoking these powers, particularly given the reported disruptions caused by demonstrators.

Reactions from State Officials

Governor Newsom and other California officials have vehemently opposed the federal deployment of troops in Los Angeles. They contend that the federal government should have sought alternative, less aggressive methods to manage protests, rather than resorting to military involvement. Sam Harbourt, a deputy solicitor general for California, articulated concerns that the military presence in civilian settings could escalate tensions and provoke potential violence rather than quell unrest.

Additionally, the state’s court arguments highlighted a critical point: while Title 10 allows for federalization, it also suggests that governors ought to be consulted. The judges of the 9th Circuit, however, underscored that this consultation does not provide a veto power to state leaders, indicating a legal precedence that favors federal authority in this instance.

Historical Context of National Guard Deployments

The current situation is unprecedented, marking the first instance in over six decades where a president has unilaterally sent in National Guard troops without prior approval from state officials. Notably, the last historical precedent was set by President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965 when he deployed the National Guard to Alabama to protect civil rights marchers.

This historical context underscores the gravity of the current deployment and raises valid questions about the balance between federal authority and state rights. In 2023, such a move draws concerns over political motivations, particularly in the realm of immigration enforcement, where sentiments are deeply divided across partisan lines. The potential ramifications extend beyond California, as indications arise that similar deployments could take place in other states with opposing views on immigration policies.

Broader Implications of the Court’s Decision

The decision from the 9th Circuit not only supports President Trump’s current posture on immigration enforcement but also establishes a legal precedent that may empower future presidents to act similarly. As the country grapples with contentious immigration issues, the ruling could allow for greater federal intervention during crises deemed significant enough by the executive branch.

Legal analysts express concerns that this expansion of federal military authority may set a concerning precedent where the executive branch could act unilaterally in domestic affairs. Such a shift would blur the lines between federal and state power, especially to states like California that resist stringent federal measures. The full scope of this legal interpretation could arrive at a critical juncture where federal and state governance dynamics come under further scrutiny.

No. Key Points
1 The 9th Circuit Court upheld President Trump’s authority to federalize National Guard troops.
2 Governor Gavin Newsom argues against the deployment, claiming it escalates tensions.
3 The legal complexities of federal versus state powers are central to the ongoing dispute.
4 Historical precedents indicate risks associated with unilateral presidential decisions.
5 Broader implications may arise, affecting future federal involvement in state matters.

Summary

The recent ruling by the 9th Circuit highlights a crucial intersection of federal authority and state rights as it pertains to the deployment of the National Guard. The unfolding legal scenario surrounding President Trump’s invocation of Title 10 raises significant questions about governance and the implications of military involvement in domestic issues. As the debate continues, the outcomes may pave the way for future executive actions, prompting a reevaluation of the delicate balance between state and federal powers in the realm of public order and safety.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What does Title 10 empower the President to do?

Title 10 of the U.S. Code empowers the President to call National Guard forces into federal service during times of national emergency, calamity, or unrest where the President believes it is necessary to suppress rebellion or enforce federal law.

Question: What are the implications of the 9th Circuit’s ruling?

The 9th Circuit’s ruling reinforces the federal government’s authority to intervene in state matters during crises, potentially leading to increased federal action in similar situations and affecting state sovereignty.

Question: How did California officials respond to the National Guard deployment?

California officials, including Governor Newsom, objected to the deployment, arguing that it escalates tensions and calling for the federal government to explore less aggressive methods to manage protests regarding immigration issues.

Angeles Appeals Breaking News Court Critical Events deploy Economic Trends Exclusive Reports Extends Global Headlines Guard Hot Topics In-Depth Stories Investigative News Latest Headlines Live Updates Local Highlights Los Major Announcements national National Updates Opinion & Analysis order Political Developments Social Issues Special Coverage Top Stories Trending Topics Trump Viral News
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp Copy Link Bluesky
News Editor
  • Website

As the News Editor at News Journos, I am dedicated to curating and delivering the latest and most impactful stories across business, finance, politics, technology, and global affairs. With a commitment to journalistic integrity, we provide breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert insights to keep our readers informed in an ever-changing world. News Journos is your go-to independent news source, ensuring fast, accurate, and reliable reporting on the topics that matter most.

Keep Reading

Top Stories

Whistleblower Texts Reveal Trump Nominee Encouraged Defiance of Court Order

5 Mins Read
Top Stories

Republicans Divided Over Trump Proposal to Cut USAID and Public Broadcasting

6 Mins Read
Top Stories

Supreme Court Considers State Restrictions on Transgender Athletes in Women’s Sports

7 Mins Read
Top Stories

FBI Searching for Military Veteran in Fourth of July Attack on Texas ICE Facility

6 Mins Read
Top Stories

Texas Flood Alerts Delayed Due to Authorization Wait, Former Official Claims

6 Mins Read
Top Stories

FIFA Establishes Office in Trump Tower, Strengthening Ties with Trump Administration

6 Mins Read
Mr Serdar Avatar

Serdar Imren

News Director

Facebook Twitter Instagram
Journalism Under Siege
Editors Picks

Judge Orders Trump Administration to Disburse $2 Billion in USAID Funds

March 11, 2025

Judge Rules Elon Musk and DOGE’s USAID Shutdown May Be Unconstitutional

March 18, 2025

Qatar Donates Jumbo Jet for Exclusive Use by Trump as Presidential Plane

May 11, 2025

Trump Attends G7 in Canada Amid Trade Tensions and Middle East Unrest

June 16, 2025

Trump Nominates Susan Monarez as Permanent CDC Director

March 24, 2025

Subscribe to News

Get the latest sports news from NewsSite about world, sports and politics.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest Vimeo WhatsApp TikTok Instagram

News

  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Money Watch

Journos

  • Top Stories
  • Turkey Reports
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Sports
  • Entertainment

COMPANY

  • About Us
  • Get In Touch
  • Our Authors
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Accessibility

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

© 2025 The News Journos. Designed by The News Journos.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.