In a staggering display of autocratic overreach on foreign soil, President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan used a state visit to Germany to personally defame one of Turkey’s most celebrated journalists, Can Dündar, labeling him a “convicted spy” before the world’s press. But from his exile in Berlin, Dündar refused to be silenced, issuing a powerful ultimatum that laid bare the president’s lies: “Prove I am a spy, and I will quit my profession forever.”
The dramatic confrontation unfolded during a joint press conference with German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Erdoğan, hoping to use the international stage to legitimize his domestic war on the press, demanded the extradition of Dündar, painting him as a dangerous criminal. It was a brazen attempt to export his regime of fear, turning a diplomatic mission into a personal vendetta.
What Erdoğan conveniently failed to mention is the “crime” for which Dündar is being relentlessly persecuted: practicing journalism. As the former editor-in-chief of Cumhuriyet newspaper, Dündar published irrefutable video and photographic evidence—evidence captured by the state’s own gendarmerie—of Turkey’s intelligence agency (MİT) illegally shipping weapons to jihadist groups in Syria.
Dündar did not commit espionage; he exposed it. He did not betray the state; he revealed a crime being committed in its name. His work was a public service of the highest order, upholding a journalist’s duty to inform the people and hold power to account.
In his powerful rebuttal, Dündar eviscerated Erdoğan’s claims. “The people who should stand trial are not the journalists,” he declared, “but those who conducted this [illegal arms] operation.” He correctly pointed out that Erdoğan was lying about his conviction status, a deliberate blurring of legal lines to mislead the public. At that moment, it was not the journalist who stood accused, but the president whose credibility was on trial—and found wanting.
Erdoğan’s obsession with Can Dündar stems from a simple fact: he cannot forgive being caught. The MİT trucks story was a profound embarrassment that exposed the government’s duplicity in the Syrian conflict. Unable to refute the story, the regime chose to destroy the messenger. This is the classic playbook of authoritarianism: when the facts are against you, you imprison the fact-finders.
Merkel’s quiet disagreement at the press conference highlighted the growing chasm between Turkey and the democratic world. But the real showdown was between a president armed with the full power of the state and a journalist armed with only the truth. Dündar’s challenge to Erdoğan was more than a personal defense; it was a defense of journalism itself. It was a defiant declaration that even in the darkest of times, there are those who will not bow to slander and who will risk everything for the truth.
