“In Turkey, journalists now spend more time in courtrooms than in newsrooms.” A Western diplomat’s bitter observation, shared in confidence, perfectly captures the grim reality of press freedom under President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. The courthouse corridor has become the forced habitat of Turkish journalism, a place where reporters are not covering the news, but have become the story itself—defendants in a war against truth.
This is not hyperbole. The statistics are a testament to a systematic purge: in a single year, 500 journalists were dismissed from their jobs, 70 were physically attacked, and thousands have been prosecuted under a law that makes it a crime to “insult the president.” This weaponized legislation has been used to silence any voice critical of the government.
Even the most senior figures in Turkish media are not immune. Sedat Ergin, the veteran editor-in-chief of Turkey’s most influential daily, Hürriyet, found himself in the dock, facing a prison sentence for allegedly insulting Erdoğan. After 41 years in the profession, Ergin’s trial symbolized a new low, confirming that no journalist is safe from the state’s reach.
But the most chilling case is that of Can Dündar and Erdem Gül of the secular newspaper Cumhuriyet. Their crime was practicing investigative journalism. They published video and photographic evidence that appeared to show Turkey’s own intelligence agency shipping weapons to Islamist groups in Syria.
The state’s retaliation was not subtle. It was led by Erdoğan himself, who publicly declared, “He who ran this story will pay heavily for it.” This was not a legal warning; it was a personal threat. Soon after, Dündar and Gül were arrested and jailed for 90 days before being released by a Constitutional Court ruling—a decision Erdoğan openly stated he did “not respect.”
Their trial on charges of espionage and aiding a terrorist organization began under a shroud of secrecy. In a move designed to prevent public scrutiny, the judge ruled the entire proceeding would be held behind closed doors.
The case drew international attention, and in a remarkable show of solidarity, a group of Western consuls-general, including Britain’s Leigh Turner, attended the hearing. Their presence was a silent protest, an affirmation of the universal value of a free press.
Erdoğan’s response was explosive and revealed a deep-seated authoritarian intolerance. “Who are you? What are you doing there?” he raged in a public speech the next day. “This is not your country, this is Turkey… Diplomats can operate within the boundaries of their missions. Elsewhere is subject to permission.”
With these words, Erdoğan attempted to redefine the rules of diplomacy, demanding that foreign representatives confine themselves to their buildings and turn a blind eye to the dismantling of democracy. The message was twofold. To the world, it was a defiant rejection of international norms. To Turkish journalists, it was a terrifying warning: no one is coming to save you. By seeking life sentences for Dündar and Gül and publicly shaming those who supported them, the government is ensuring that the next journalist with an explosive story thinks twice. The goal is not just to win in the courtroom, but to ensure silence in the newsroom.
