Close Menu
News JournosNews Journos
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Latest Headlines:
  • Nvidia’s Jensen Huang Courts Beijing Amid Renewed Market Access in China
  • Volcanic Eruption in Iceland Forces Evacuation of Tourists from Blue Lagoon as Lava Approaches Grindavik
  • Humanity Faces Significant Losses, Says Spokesperson
  • Gun Seller Backed by Donald Trump Jr. Launches Stock Trading
  • Lightning Strike in New Jersey Leaves 1 Dead, 13 Injured
  • Used EV Batteries Poised to Power AI Growth
  • UK Inflation Data Reveals Key Trends for June
  • Hijacked Small Plane Grounds Flights at Vancouver International Airport
  • Experts Warn of Vulnerabilities in Federal E-Verify System Following Workplace Raids
  • Trial Commences Over Alleged Facebook Privacy Violations Involving CEO and Others
  • Controversy Surrounds Franco-Israeli Singer Amir at Francofolies de Spa Festival
  • Newsom Criticizes Trump’s National Guard Move, Urges Maturity
  • Potential Consequences of Trump’s Dismissal of Fed Chair Powell
  • Prince Harry Honors Diana’s Legacy by Advocating Against Landmines in Angola
  • Tsunami Warning Lowered to Advisory Following 7.2 Magnitude Earthquake near Alaska
  • Goldman Sachs Reports Q2 2025 Earnings Results
  • Rubio Calls Israeli Strike on Damascus a ‘Misunderstanding’ Amid Peace Efforts
  • Complete Skeleton of Medieval Knight Discovered Beneath Former Ice Cream Parlor in Poland
  • James Gunn Discusses “Superman”: Release Date, Character’s Immigrant Story, and Themes of Kindness
  • Assembly Discusses Olive Grove; Tanal’s Brief Action Sparks Varank’s Controversial Remarks
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
News JournosNews Journos
Subscribe
Friday, July 25
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
News JournosNews Journos
Judge Dismisses Expert Testimony on Lack of Crime in Teen Girls' Terrorism Case

Judge Dismisses Expert Testimony on Lack of Crime in Teen Girls’ Terrorism Case

Serdar ImrenBy Serdar ImrenJune 14, 2025 Turkey Reports 6 Mins Read

The ongoing terrorism trial in Turkey involving 41 defendants, including young girls charged for seemingly innocuous activities such as Quran study, has sparked significant concern among human rights advocates and legal experts. During a recent hearing, the presiding judge openly dismissed the legal arguments of a highly respected criminal law scholar, raising alarms about the integrity of judicial proceedings. Critics argue this case exemplifies the broader issues within Turkey’s counterterrorism laws, which many believe unjustly target political dissidents and ordinary citizens under vague definitions of terrorism.

Article Subheadings
1) The Dismissal of Legal Opinions in Court
2) Procedural Irregularities Raising Questions
3) Background on the “Girls’ Trial”
4) Media and International Observations
5) Looking Ahead: Next Steps in the Trial

The Dismissal of Legal Opinions in Court

During a critical hearing in Turkey’s ongoing terrorism trial, the presiding judge, identified as B.Ö., openly discredited the legal perspective of Professor İzzet Özgenç, a reputable criminal law scholar and one of the original drafters of the Turkish Penal Code. Professor Özgenç had submitted a written opinion asserting that the indictment lacked the elements of a criminal offense. His analysis claimed that activities such as reading the Quran and conducting study sessions are lawful and enjoy constitutional protection. In a move viewed as unprecedented, the judge remarked that he had previously purchased one of Özgenç’s books only to “tear it up,” an action that legal experts interpret as a clear display of bias known as ihsası rey, which threatens the impartiality of the judicial process.

This incident highlights a troubling trend in the Turkish legal system, where respected legal opinions are publicly dismissed, raising concerns over judicial independence. Legal professionals stress that such behavior not only erodes confidence in the judicial process but also indicates a specific agenda against certain intellectual viewpoints, particularly those dissenting from government narratives.

Procedural Irregularities Raising Questions

The trial’s procedural integrity has come into question increasingly due to various irregularities. For instance, during the recent hearing, one of the three judges was absent for a substantial part of the proceedings, sparking debates about the court’s legality and its adherence to established judicial norms. Moreover, requests from the defense to extend the inquiry phase have been consistently rejected, raising further concerns about the defendants’ right to adequately prepare their case and present their arguments.

Compounding these issues is the harsh reality that all defendants continue to face travel bans, limiting their mobility and further complicating their legal defenses. Many legal experts warn that such procedural discrepancies may constitute violations of the defendants’ rights to fair trial standards as stipulated by both Turkish law and international human rights conventions.

Background on the “Girls’ Trial”

Known widely as the “girls’ trial,” this case has garnered international scrutiny for prosecuting young individuals for participating in common religious and educational practices. The government, under President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, officially designated the Gülen movement — a spiritual group inspired by the exiled cleric Fethullah Gülen — as a terrorist organization following a failed coup in July 2016. Since then, a sweeping purge has targeted thousands under the premise of counterterrorism, with many trials focusing on alleged affiliations to this movement.

The defendants, including teenage girls, were taken into custody during early morning operations in May 2024, accused of having links to the Gülen movement. Many were detained without access to legal counsel or parental contact and reportedly faced threats while in police custody. As the charges involve seemingly everyday activities — such as attending Quran study groups or tutoring sessions — many observers argue the case underscores the broader societal crackdown against individuals simply seeking educational and religious fulfillment.

Media and International Observations

Several human rights organizations, both local and international, have been closely monitoring the trial due to concerns regarding legal fairness and human rights abuses. Observers from groups such as the Italian Federation for Human Rights (FIDU) and the International Center for Religion & Diplomacy have expressed dissatisfaction with the proceedings. FIDU President Antonio Stango criticized the court’s actions, labeling them as politically motivated.

In earlier observations, advocates like Andrea Barron, an expert based in the U.S., specifically highlighted hostile questioning techniques employed by the judge. Barron noted instances where the judge interrogated students about their study habits, suggesting that the court’s approach was ideologically driven rather than factual in nature. Such testimonies raise alarms regarding the extent to which legal processes are being manipulated for political aims.

Looking Ahead: Next Steps in the Trial

As the trial unfolds, the prosecution is expected to present its final opinion during the next hearing scheduled for June 27. However, experts caution that a ruling might not follow immediately after this presentation. With significant attention on the courtroom proceedings, the outcomes could set important precedents regarding the treatment of minority groups and the interpretation of anti-terrorism laws in Turkey.

With international human rights groups stepping up their scrutiny, the stakes are high not only for the defendants but also for the Turkish judiciary’s reputation. Observers remain watchful, as the anticipated decision may have ramifications that extend beyond this single trial, influencing future cases related to the Gülen movement and political dissent in Turkey.

No. Key Points
1 The Turkish trial involves 41 defendants, including young girls accused of terrorism for participating in religious activities.
2 The presiding judge publicly rejected a respected legal scholar’s opinion, raising questions about impartiality.
3 Procedural irregularities, including absent judges and rejected defense requests, have marred the trial.
4 This case reflects the broader crackdown on alleged ties to the Gülen movement, labeled as terrorism by the Turkish government.
5 International human rights organizations are monitoring the trial, citing concerns over political motivations behind the prosecution.

Summary

The unfolding terrorism trial in Turkey poses significant questions about the rule of law and the treatment of individuals accused of having ties to the Gülen movement. With allegations of procedural irregularities and the dismissal of legal expertise, the integrity of the judicial process is coming under increasing scrutiny. This case not only affects the defendants but may also have broader implications for civil liberties in Turkey, raising alarms for human rights advocates both domestically and internationally.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What is the basis for the charges against the defendants in the trial?

The charges are based on activities considered normal by many, such as attending Quran study groups, organizing tutoring sessions, and even socializing, which the government claims indicate membership in a terrorist organization.

Question: What are the consequences of the judge’s dismissal of legal opinions?

The judge’s public dismissal raises serious concerns about the impartiality of the trial, possibly leading to a lack of faith in the judicial system and the legitimacy of its proceedings.

Question: Why has international attention focused on this trial?

International focus has intensified due to the trial’s implications for human rights in Turkey, particularly regarding the treatment of religious and educational practices under the law.

case Crime Critical Issues in Turkey Democracy in Turkey Dismisses Domestic Affairs Turkey Economic Policy Turkey Expert Girls Government Policies Turkey Judge Lack Legislative Updates Turkey Media and Politics Turkey National Security Turkey Political Developments Turkey Political Reforms Turkey Regional Impact Turkey Social Issues Turkey Teen terrorism Testimony Turkey’s Strategic Developments Turkish Diplomacy Turkish Elections Turkish Foreign Relations Turkish Leadership Turkish Legal Affairs Turkish Politics Turkish Public Policy
Serdar Imren
  • Website

Serdar Imren is a distinguished journalist with an extensive background as a News Director for major Turkish media outlets. His work has consistently focused on upholding the core principles of journalistic integrity: accuracy, impartiality, and a commitment to the truth. In response to the growing restrictions on press freedom in Turkey, he established News Journos to create a platform for independent and critical journalism. His reporting and analysis cover Turkish politics, human rights, and the challenges facing a free press in an increasingly authoritarian environment.

Keep Reading

Turkey Reports

Humanity Faces Significant Losses, Says Spokesperson

6 Mins Read
Turkey Reports

Assembly Discusses Olive Grove; Tanal’s Brief Action Sparks Varank’s Controversial Remarks

5 Mins Read
Turkey Reports

Mothers Reflect on PKK Weapon-Burning Ceremony: A Call for Peace

7 Mins Read
Turkey Reports

Özgür Özel Warns of Dream Disturbance: “A Nightmare Awaits”

5 Mins Read
Turkey Reports

İmamoğlu Receives 1-Year, 7-Month Prison Sentence for Remarks Against Chief Prosecutor

7 Mins Read
Turkey Reports

Prosecutor Tensions Emerge in Imamoglu Case Amid Controversy Over Evidence Access

5 Mins Read
Mr Serdar Avatar

Serdar Imren

News Director

Facebook Twitter Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • About Us
  • Get In Touch
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • Terms and Conditions
© 2025 The News Journos. Designed by The News Journos.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.