Close Menu
News JournosNews Journos
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
Editors Picks

Trump Expresses Optimism for Russia-Ukraine Negotiations This Week

April 20, 2025

Expert Warns of China’s Growing Influence on the U.S.

April 28, 2025

Senate Review of Medicare Abuse Could Impact Trump Administration’s Bill, According to Hassett

June 8, 2025

U.S. Allies in Middle East Informed in Advance of Israeli Strikes on Iran

June 13, 2025

Trump Offers Gratitude to El Salvador for Accepting Alleged Gang Members

March 16, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Latest Headlines:
  • Five Strategies to Lower Your Student Loan Payments Now
  • Nvidia Hits Milestone as First Company to Reach $4 Trillion Valuation
  • Eli Manning Declines Ownership Bid Opportunity
  • New Aid Distribution Model for Gaza Seeks to Bypass Hamas Interference
  • Can You Prevent Mark Zuckerberg from Using Your Art on Facebook?
  • McDonald’s Revamps Menu with New Snack Wraps and Spicy McMuffins to Attract Customers
  • Art Detective Reclaims Stolen Centuries-Old Documents
  • Trump Issues New Letters Imposing Higher Tariff Rates Globally
  • Armed Police Raid National Rally Headquarters in Paris Amid Financial Probe
  • Texas Flood Rescue Teams Search for Missing as Death Toll Rises
  • Linda Yaccarino Resigns as CEO of X
  • California Governor’s South Carolina Visit Sparks 2028 Presidential Speculation
  • EU Court Rejects ‘I Love’ Trademark Application
  • NYC Teachers Union Backs Socialist Candidate Zohran Mamdani for Mayor
  • Father and Son Detained in Ukraine for Alleged Attempt to Smuggle Missile System Information
  • Qantas Data Breach Exposes Millions of Customer Records Across Platforms
  • Major Tech Platforms Announce New Features Impacting Users
  • Hamas Employed Sexual Violence as Tactic During October 7 Attack, Report Reveals
  • Karalar Dismissed from Position, Says Spokesperson
  • Trump’s Potential Fed Chair Selection Faces Credibility Concerns
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
News JournosNews Journos
Subscribe
Wednesday, July 9
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
News JournosNews Journos
You are here: News Journos » Europe News » Lawmakers reject Commission decision to scrap planned AI liability rules
Lawmakers reject Commission decision to scrap planned AI liability rules

Lawmakers reject Commission decision to scrap planned AI liability rules

News EditorBy News EditorFebruary 19, 2025 Europe News 6 Mins Read

The European Parliament is at a crossroads regarding the proposed AI Liability Directive, which was recently removed from the European Commission’s 2025 work program due to stalled negotiations. Despite this setback, lawmakers from the Parliament’s Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee have signaled their intention to continue pursuing these liability rules for artificial intelligence (AI) products. As discussions unfold, the implications of these regulations resonate throughout the tech industry and consumer protection sectors in Europe.

Article Subheadings
1) European Commission’s Withdrawal Proposal
2) Legislative Divide Among Lawmakers
3) Challenges and Concerns on AI Regulations
4) The Influence of U.S. Standards
5) Implications for SMEs and Consumers

European Commission’s Withdrawal Proposal

The European Commission’s decision to withdraw the AI Liability Directive from its 2025 work program came as a significant blow to proponents of the legislation. Presented last week, the Commission’s work plan indicated that “no foreseeable agreement” on the proposal was expected, prompting concerns about the future of liability regulations in the rapidly evolving AI landscape. While the Commission has not officially retracted the directive, the lack of progress in negotiations raises questions about its viability.

The directive, introduced in 2022, aims to establish liability frameworks for AI products that would hold manufacturers accountable when their systems cause harm. This directive was proposed alongside the EU’s AI Act, which seeks to regulate the deployment of AI systems based on the perceived risks they pose to society. However, according to a spokesperson for the European Parliament, this initiative faces a potential suspension unless considerable effort is made by parliamentarians and the EU Council in the year ahead to reach a consensus.

Legislative Divide Among Lawmakers

The decision to withdraw the directive has elicited mixed reactions among lawmakers in the European Parliament. Members of the Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee (IMCO) expressed determination to keep the AI Liability Directive alive on the political agenda, despite pushback from various factions within the Parliament. For instance, German MEP Axel Voss, tasked with guiding the proposal through Parliament, described the Commission’s move as a “strategic mistake.” He emphasized the importance of establishing these regulations to ensure accountability in AI deployment.

Conversely, Andreas Schwab, a fellow German lawmaker from the European People’s Party, voiced support for the decision to postpone discussions on the proposal. He argued that it is prudent to wait and observe how the AI Act unfolds before implementing additional liability measures. Schwab stated, “The legislation needs to be watertight first,” highlighting the complexities involved in crafting effective regulations. As conflicting viewpoints continue to inform the discussion, the future of AI liability rules remains uncertain.

Challenges and Concerns on AI Regulations

The challenges surrounding AI regulation extend beyond internal disagreements among lawmakers. There is palpable concern about the potential implications of the AI Liability Directive on various stakeholders. Marc Angel, representing the center-left groups, criticized the Commission’s withdrawal decision as “disappointing.” He maintained that harmonized rules across Europe would foster transparency, fairness, and accountability in AI systems, providing critical protections for consumers.

On the other hand, representatives from the tech industry have expressed that existing liability issues are sufficiently covered under the revamped Product Liability Directive (PLD). This divergence of opinion highlights a crucial conflict within the EU’s approach to AI regulation, emphasizing the need for a unified stance on these pressing legal and ethical issues. As European lawmakers grapple with the nuances of the AI landscape, organizations from the tech sector assert the importance of fostering innovation while maintaining robust consumer protection standards.

The Influence of U.S. Standards

The complexities surrounding the AI Liability Directive are amplified by international influences, notably from regulatory approaches taken in the United States. Concerns have been raised that outsourcing regulatory standards to U.S. frameworks could create inconsistencies within the EU and compromise the safety of European consumers. Kim van Sparrentak, a Dutch MEP from the Greens party, articulated that the absence of strict liability regulations demonstrates a “lack of understanding” regarding the initial motivations for proposing these rules.

By creating comprehensive liability measures, the EU aims to establish a level playing field for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) and ensure broad consumer protections across member states. Should these measures fall into disarray, the implications for both consumers and businesses in Europe could be profound, calling into question the integrity of the current regulatory landscape.

Implications for SMEs and Consumers

The potential fallout from the AI Liability Directive’s withdrawal raises urgent questions regarding the future protection of consumers and smaller businesses in the EU. A study presented to the Parliament’s legal affairs committee earlier this year identified risks associated with artificial intelligence products, particularly those based on large language models such as ChatGPT and Claude.ai. These emerging technologies could escape the scope of existing liability frameworks, leaving consumers unprotected in cases of AI-related harm.

The Brussels tech lobby has been divided on the necessity of additional regulations, with some advocating for an overhaul of existing policies to close loopholes that may disadvantage consumers. Consumer organizations, in contrast, have largely welcomed the prospect of specific legislation focused on AI liability, suggesting that additional protections are crucial for both safeguarding users and fostering public trust in AI technologies.

No. Key Points
1 The European Commission has proposed withdrawing the AI Liability Directive from its 2025 work program.
2 Lawmakers from the IMCO Committee intend to continue pursuing the directive despite the Commission’s stance.
3 Internal disagreements among lawmakers highlight the complexity of developing effective AI regulations.
4 Concerns persist about the implications of the directive on consumers and SMEs in the European market.
5 The call for harmonized regulations has intensified among various stakeholders, emphasizing the need for consumer protections.

Summary

The ongoing debate regarding the AI Liability Directive underscores significant challenges facing the European Parliament amid evolving technologies. As stakeholders voice differing perspectives on the urgency and necessity of these regulations, the repercussions of delayed legislation are likely to impact both consumers and businesses in the European market. The future of AI liability remains uncertain, raising critical questions about accountability, safety, and the structure of regulatory frameworks guiding AI ethics and use.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: Why was the AI Liability Directive withdrawn from the 2025 work program?

The European Commission indicated that there was no foreseeable agreement on the proposal, leading to its removal from the work program.

Question: What are the main concerns regarding the AI Liability Directive?

Concerns include the potential lack of protection for consumers and SMEs if the directive is not implemented, as well as the risk of AI technologies escaping liability under existing frameworks.

Question: How do different stakeholders view the need for additional AI regulations?

Opinions are divided, with some tech representatives believing that existing liability rules are sufficient, while consumer groups advocate for specific legislation to enhance protections related to AI technologies.

Brexit Commission Continental Affairs Cultural Developments decision Economic Integration Energy Crisis Environmental Policies EU Policies European Leaders European Markets European Politics European Union Eurozone Economy Infrastructure Projects International Relations Lawmakers liability Migration Issues planned Regional Cooperation Regional Security reject rules scrap Social Reforms Technology in Europe Trade Agreements
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp Copy Link Bluesky
News Editor
  • Website

As the News Editor at News Journos, I am dedicated to curating and delivering the latest and most impactful stories across business, finance, politics, technology, and global affairs. With a commitment to journalistic integrity, we provide breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert insights to keep our readers informed in an ever-changing world. News Journos is your go-to independent news source, ensuring fast, accurate, and reliable reporting on the topics that matter most.

Keep Reading

Europe News

EU Court Rejects ‘I Love’ Trademark Application

6 Mins Read
Europe News

New Crisis Threatens Britain’s Troubled Rail System

6 Mins Read
Europe News

Trump Supports Attorney General Following Shift on Epstein Client List Inquiry

6 Mins Read
Europe News

Bayeux Tapestry to Be Displayed in the UK for First Time in Nearly 1,000 Years

6 Mins Read
Europe News

Wildfire Near Marseille Leaves Over 100 Injured and Hundreds Evacuated

5 Mins Read
Europe News

Spanish Police Investigate Speeding in Fatal Crash Involving Footballer and Brother

7 Mins Read
Mr Serdar Avatar

Serdar Imren

News Director

Facebook Twitter Instagram
Journalism Under Siege
Editors Picks

Democrats Defend PBS and NPR with Children’s Show References: ‘Fire Elon, Save Elmo’

March 26, 2025

Trump Administration Threatens Jail Time and Fines for Undocumented Immigrants Who Don’t Register

February 25, 2025

Michigan Couple Jailed in Mexico Set to Return to U.S.

April 4, 2025

Democrats Call for Action Against Musk and Trump Following 800+ Job Cuts at Weather Agency

March 1, 2025

DOGE Cancels Grants for Trans Animal Studies

March 5, 2025

Subscribe to News

Get the latest sports news from NewsSite about world, sports and politics.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest Vimeo WhatsApp TikTok Instagram

News

  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Money Watch

Journos

  • Top Stories
  • Turkey Reports
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Sports
  • Entertainment

COMPANY

  • About Us
  • Get In Touch
  • Our Authors
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Accessibility

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

© 2025 The News Journos. Designed by The News Journos.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.