Close Menu
News JournosNews Journos
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
Editors Picks

Judge Investigates Trump Deportation Flights for Possible Court Order Violation

April 3, 2025

District Judge Blocks Trump Administration’s Two-Gender Policy on U.S. Passports

June 17, 2025

Trump Calls for Comprehensive End to Iran’s Nuclear Program Beyond Israel-Iran Ceasefire

June 17, 2025

Trump and Musk Promote ‘Full Transparency’ in DOGE Initiatives

February 20, 2025

Colorado Democrats Clash with Republicans After Passing Bills Against Trump Administration Orders

April 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Latest Headlines:
  • Hurricane Melissa Strikes Jamaica with Severe Winds and Rain, Moves Toward Cuba
  • 5 Key Tips for Protecting Your Online Privacy on Social Media
  • Portland Statue Controversy Concludes with Reinstatement Decision
  • Lithuanian FM Urges EU to Strengthen Eastern Defense Amid Rising Tensions
  • Nvidia AI Chips Enter Full Production in Arizona
  • Severe Flooding Strands Residents and Disrupts Life in Seven Provinces
  • U.S. Strikes Four Alleged Drug Boats in Pacific, Killing 14 and Leaving One Survivor
  • Amazon to Cut 14,000 Jobs Amid AI Integration Efforts
  • Bob Mackie Reflects on Iconic Career Designing for Legends Like Tina Turner and Cher
  • Louisiana Residents Concerned About Rising Energy Costs and Meta AI Data Center Construction
  • Netanyahu Commands Intensified Gaza Strikes After Ceasefire Breach
  • Trump Dismisses Oversight Board for D.C. Construction Amid Plans for White House Changes
  • European Stocks Decline Despite FTSE 100 Reaching Record High
  • Stocks to Watch: After-Hours Movers Include Visa, Seagate, Caesars, and Mondelez
  • Activist Investor Targets Underperforming U.S. Banks
  • Transgender Rabbi with Iranian Allegations Supports NYC Mayoral Candidate
  • Florida Breaks Execution Record with 15th Inmate this Year
  • Hurricane Melissa poses severe flood and landslide risk to Jamaica, Haiti, and Cuba
  • Tesla Reinstitutes Mad Max Mode in Full Self-Driving Update
  • Putin Appoints Family Members to Key Positions Amid Kremlin Instability Concerns
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
News JournosNews Journos
Subscribe
Wednesday, October 29
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
News JournosNews Journos
You are here: News Journos » U.S. News » Speaker Johnson Declares War Powers Act Unconstitutional
Speaker Johnson Declares War Powers Act Unconstitutional

Speaker Johnson Declares War Powers Act Unconstitutional

News EditorBy News EditorJune 24, 2025 U.S. News 5 Mins Read

In a recent press conference, House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Republican from Louisiana, voiced strong opposition to the War Powers Act, describing it as unconstitutional. He stated that a resolution aimed at restricting U.S. military actions in Iran would not be supported in the House. Johnson’s remarks follow President Donald Trump’s decision to launch strikes against Iranian nuclear sites, which he asserts falls well within the president’s constitutional authority. Amid the backdrop of ongoing conflicts in the Middle East, this political development raises significant questions regarding the balance of power between Congress and the presidency.

Article Subheadings
1) The Constitution and War Powers
2) Johnson’s Constitutional Interpretation
3) Recent Military Escalations
4) Congressional Response and Resolution
5) Implications for Future Military Actions

The Constitution and War Powers

At the core of this political debate lies the War Powers Act of 1973, legislation designed to limit the president’s ability to engage in military actions without Congressional approval. Under Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, Congress possesses the authority to declare war. However, since World War II, that power has largely been unexercised, raising concerns among lawmakers and scholars alike regarding the balance between legislative and executive powers. The War Powers Resolution requires regular updates to Congress from the president on military actions, emphasizing the need for legislative oversight in matters of war.

Johnson’s Constitutional Interpretation

Speaker Mike Johnson has voiced a contentious stance regarding the War Powers Act, suggesting that it conflicts with Article II of the Constitution, which designates the president as the commander-in-chief. By asserting that the president has the authority to undertake military action, Johnson aligns with a viewpoint that critiques the War Powers Act as an infringement on the powers outlined in the Constitution. He noted that many constitutional scholars support this interpretation, contending that the Act undermines the president’s role during situations requiring swift military responses, such as the current tensions involving Iran and Israel.

Recent Military Escalations

The political discourse surrounding military action escalated following President Donald Trump’s recent decision to strike Iranian nuclear sites. The strikes were framed as a necessary step to protect U.S. national interests and allies in the region. Johnson underscored that in light of the president’s powers, he views these actions as legally and constitutionally sound. As tensions continue to rise between Iran and Israel, many analysts foresee a challenging environment characterized by unpredictable military engagements, further complicating the legal and political landscape in Washington.

Congressional Response and Resolution

In response to these developments, Rep. Thomas Massie, a Republican from Kentucky, along with Rep. Ro Khanna, a Democrat from California, introduced a resolution aimed at preventing U.S. military involvement in “unauthorized hostilities” in Iran. The resolution has garnered support from over a dozen House Democrats and mirrors a similar measure put forth by Sen. Tim Kaine in the Senate. The privileged status of the resolution may allow it to quickly reach a vote in the House, presenting a significant challenge to Speaker Johnson‘s leadership and the majority’s stance against it.

Implications for Future Military Actions

The ongoing dialogue about the War Powers Act and the current military situation implies far-reaching consequences for U.S. foreign policy. As Johnson indicated during his press conference, should the conflict in the Middle East escalate, future decisions regarding military actions will remain controversial and could spark further legislative challenges. The resolution by Massie adds another layer of complexity to the interaction between the executive branch’s military authority and Congress’s obligation to oversee such actions, potentially reshaping the interpretation and application of the War Powers Act moving forward.

No. Key Points
1 House Speaker Mike Johnson deems the War Powers Act unconstitutional.
2 President Trump‘s military strikes in Iran were described by Johnson as within constitutional bounds.
3 A congressional resolution aimed at limiting military actions has been introduced but faces opposition.
4 There are ongoing debates regarding the balance of power between Congress and the presidency in military decisions.
5 The implications of these political developments could reshape U.S. foreign policy frameworks.

Summary

The recent statements made by House Speaker Mike Johnson reveal a critical moment in the ongoing debate over the War Powers Act and presidential authority. As the U.S. navigates increased military involvement in the Middle East, the balance of power between Congress and the presidency remains a pivotal issue. The outcome of proposed resolutions and further military actions will significantly impact U.S. foreign policy and the interpretation of constitutional powers.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What is the War Powers Resolution?

The War Powers Resolution is a federal law that requires the president to consult with Congress before deploying U.S. military forces and mandates that military action must cease within 60 days unless Congress approves further action.

Question: Why is the interpretation of constitutional powers critical in this debate?

The interpretation of constitutional powers is significant because it directly affects the decision-making process regarding military engagement, impacting both national security and legislative oversight.

Question: What might be the possible outcomes of the proposed resolution by Rep. Massie?

The proposed resolution could either be swiftly passed in the House due to its privileged status or face significant opposition, reflecting the continuing complexities of military actions and legislative authority in U.S. governance.

Act Congress Crime declares Economy Education Elections Environmental Issues Healthcare Immigration Johnson Natural Disasters Politics Powers Public Policy Social Issues Speaker Supreme Court Technology Unconstitutional War White House
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp Copy Link Bluesky
News Editor
  • Website

As the News Editor at News Journos, I am dedicated to curating and delivering the latest and most impactful stories across business, finance, politics, technology, and global affairs. With a commitment to journalistic integrity, we provide breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert insights to keep our readers informed in an ever-changing world. News Journos is your go-to independent news source, ensuring fast, accurate, and reliable reporting on the topics that matter most.

Keep Reading

U.S. News

Nvidia AI Chips Enter Full Production in Arizona

6 Mins Read
U.S. News

Florida Breaks Execution Record with 15th Inmate this Year

5 Mins Read
U.S. News

Company Cuts 45% of Workforce Amid AI Challenges

7 Mins Read
U.S. News

Registered Sex Offender Arrested for Attempted Rape at Johns Hopkins

6 Mins Read
U.S. News

Former Treasury Secretary Claims Status as Soybean Farmer

5 Mins Read
U.S. News

New Evidence Surfaces in Amy Bradley Cold Case After 27 Years

6 Mins Read
Journalism Under Siege
Editors Picks

Justice Department Ousting Ongoing, Targeting Investigators in Trump Document Case and Jan. 6 Prosecution

July 13, 2025

Trump Warns Trade Policies Could Lead to Fewer, More Expensive Toys for Children

May 1, 2025

U.S. Tariff Calculations Uncovered: A Look at the Process

April 3, 2025

FEMA CFO Dismissed After Migrant Payments, Claims Approval with DOGE Sign-off

March 6, 2025

Democratic States File Lawsuit Against Trump Administration Over $6 Billion in Frozen Education Funds

July 14, 2025

Subscribe to News

Get the latest sports news from NewsSite about world, sports and politics.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest Vimeo WhatsApp TikTok Instagram

News

  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Money Watch

Journos

  • Top Stories
  • Turkey Reports
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Sports
  • Entertainment

COMPANY

  • About Us
  • Get In Touch
  • Our Authors
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Accessibility

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

© 2025 The News Journos. Designed by The News Journos.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.
Go to mobile version