Close Menu
News JournosNews Journos
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
Editors Picks

Judge Orders Trump Administration to Revoke Mass Federal Worker Firing Directive

February 27, 2025

State Department Uses DOGE to Reduce Biden Administration’s DEI Requirement

April 7, 2025

Trump Pledges to Uphold Christian Faith in Palm Sunday Message Welcoming Holy Week

April 13, 2025

Michigan Couple Jailed in Mexico Set to Return to U.S.

April 4, 2025

Trump Administration Mandates English Proficiency for Truck Drivers

May 20, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Latest Headlines:
  • Luxury Real Estate Market Faces Growing Divides
  • UK Car and Vehicle Production Hits 76-Year Low in May
  • Türkiye Experiences Extreme Temperature Variations: Rize Heats Up While Snowfall Surpasses 5 Meters
  • Former Aide to Jill Biden Subpoenaed in House GOP Investigation into Biden’s Age
  • Moscow Parade Video Misinterpreted as Pre-attack Preparations for Ukraine
  • Tampa Bay Rays’ Wander Franco Convicted of Sexual Abuse in Dominican Republic
  • Mossad Chief Acknowledges US Support in Halting Iran’s Nuclear Efforts
  • Graham and Seymour Post Beach Selfies from Italian Getaway
  • Pixar’s ‘Elio’ Highlights Challenges Facing Hollywood
  • U.S. Continues to Stand Out Despite 2025 Overseas Competition, Says Expert
  • CHP Assigned to Call Committee, Trustee Role Excluded
  • Trump and Rutte’s Bond Dominates NATO Summit Discussions
  • Celebrity Guests Gather in Venice for Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sánchez’s Wedding
  • Justin Tucker Suspended by NFL Following Sexual Misconduct Investigations
  • Stock Market Nears Record High Following April Decline: Key Factors Explained
  • Climate Movement Files Landmark Class Action Lawsuit Against EPA
  • George Kittle Explains Loyalty to His Unique Sasquatch Driver
  • North Korea to Launch Major Tourist Site Amid Continued Restrictions on Foreign Visitors
  • Iran’s Efforts to Save Face Following Strikes on Nuclear Sites
  • NYPD Arrests Six During Protest Outside Tech Firm Office
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
News JournosNews Journos
Subscribe
Friday, June 27
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
News JournosNews Journos
You are here: News Journos » U.S. News » Trump Administration Lifts Ban on Devices Increasing Rifle Fire Rate
Trump Administration Lifts Ban on Devices Increasing Rifle Fire Rate

Trump Administration Lifts Ban on Devices Increasing Rifle Fire Rate

News EditorBy News EditorMay 17, 2025 U.S. News 7 Mins Read

The recent settlement between the Justice Department and Rare Breed Triggers marks a significant shift in U.S. firearm regulations, allowing the sale of forced-reset triggers which can increase the firing rate of semiautomatic rifles. Previously classified as illegal machine gun conversion devices, these aftermarket triggers faced a long-standing federal ban. The announcement has sparked intense debate, with advocates fearing it may exacerbate gun violence, while supporters herald it as a victory for Second Amendment rights.

Article Subheadings
1) Shift in Gun Policy Under the Trump Administration
2) Background on Forced-Reset Triggers
3) Perspectives from Advocacy Groups
4) Legal Implications of the Settlement
5) Future of Gun Rights Legislation

Shift in Gun Policy Under the Trump Administration

The Trump administration’s recent decision reflects a broader reevaluation of gun control laws, especially surrounding the use of accessories intended to modify firearms. This settlement announced by the Justice Department signals a departure from the regulatory framework established under the previous administration, which sought to strengthen restrictions on gun sales and ownership. The Obama and Biden administrations had worked tirelessly to keep measures in place that attempted to mitigate gun violence following several high-profile mass shootings across the nation. President Trump’s policy change indicates a potentially more lenient approach to Second Amendment rights, which many supporters view as a restoration of individual freedoms while critics perceive it as a step backward in public safety.

Moreover, this settlement may present a crucial political battleground leading up to upcoming elections, with various groups highlighting their stances on gun control. Advocates for gun rights argue that the government’s previous actions had unfairly targeted law-abiding citizens, while those in favor of gun control see this as a troubling trend that could lead to increased firearm-related incidents. The Justice Department’s announcement came just as pressure mounts from both sides of the political divide, and suggests an attempt by the Trump administration to solidify its base by aligning with gun rights proponents.

Background on Forced-Reset Triggers

Forced-reset triggers are devices designed to alter the firing mechanism of semiautomatic rifles, enabling them to fire more rounds with less manual engagement from the shooter. These aftermarket triggers began gaining popularity among gun enthusiasts who wished to modify their weapons to improve firing speed and efficiency. However, federal authorities had previously classified such triggers as illegal machine gun conversion devices, arguing that they violate the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) regulations. This classification meant that owners of forced-reset triggers could face significant legal repercussions, including the possibility of having their devices confiscated.

The legal debates surrounding these triggers have unfolded over several years, culminating in the recent agreement. After multiple lawsuits by Rare Breed Triggers challenging the government’s stance, this settlement has implications not just for the trigger manufacturers but for the entire landscape of firearm modifications and assessments of legality. The ramifications of this decision are expected to reverberate throughout the firearm community, potentially leading to more individuals attempting to utilize similar devices, now that their legality has been reaffirmed.

Perspectives from Advocacy Groups

Responses to the settlement have been divided sharply among advocacy groups. Supporters of gun rights view the decision as a pivotal moment in the advancement of Second Amendment protections.

“This Department of Justice believes that the 2nd Amendment is not a second-class right,”

stated Attorney General Pam Bondi in an official statement. This notion of reinstating rights surrounding firearm ownership is echoed by the president of Rare Breed Triggers, Lawrence DeMonico, who heralded the settlement as a “landmark moment in the fight against unchecked government overreach.”

Conversely, gun control advocates express serious concerns over the potential consequences of relaxing restrictions on such accessories. Vanessa Gonzalez, vice president of government and political affairs at a leading gun control group, expressed her fears, stating,

“The Trump administration has just effectively legalized machine guns. Lives will be lost because of his actions.”

This sentiment reflects a broader anxiety regarding the ongoing gun violence crisis in the United States. Advocacy groups fear that easier access to rapid-fire modifications could lead to more tragic incidents, particularly in settings where weapon use can escalate quickly.

Legal Implications of the Settlement

The settlement between the Justice Department and Rare Breed Triggers carries significant legal implications. Firstly, it establishes a precedent for the classification of aftermarket firearm components and highlights the shifting interpretations of federal firearm regulations. The agreement also stipulates that Rare Breed Triggers may not develop devices intended for use on handguns, thus carving out a specific scope within which they operate.

In addition, the settlement mandates that the ATF return any previously seized devices to their original owners, which could lead to many individuals reclaiming their property without repercussions. This element of the agreement might signal to manufacturers and distributors alike that similar accessories may now enter the market with less regulatory oversight. As a result, this could spur a wave of new firearm modifications as consumers seek to enhance their weapons’ capabilities.

Future of Gun Rights Legislation

Looking ahead, the implications of this settlement may greatly influence future gun rights legislation. The ongoing debate regarding firearm regulations is one of the most contested issues in American politics, often bringing heated discussions to the forefront during election cycles. Legislative experts note that the relaxation of rules around forced-reset triggers could embolden lawmakers seeking to further dismantle gun control measures established in previous years.

The future landscape of gun rights may also hinge on upcoming legal challenges that arise in response to this settlement. Should similar cases emerge regarding the legality of other firearm accessories, the courts may be tasked with further clarifying the intersection between the Second Amendment and regulatory authority. Moreover, the potential for increased firearm violence raises pressing questions among legislators and the public alike about how to balance individual rights with collective safety. Stakeholders across the spectrum will be watching closely as this new chapter in gun policy unfolds.

No. Key Points
1 The Trump administration has lifted a ban on the sale of forced-reset triggers.
2 Forced-reset triggers modify semiautomatic rifles to fire more rapidly.
3 The settlement raises concerns about potential increases in gun violence.
4 The agreement requires the ATF to return previously seized devices to their owners.
5 Future political debates will focus on balancing gun rights with public safety.

Summary

The settlement between the Justice Department and Rare Breed Triggers represents a crucial pivot in U.S. gun policy, addressing contentious issues surrounding firearm modifications and individual rights. While proponents herald this as a victory for Second Amendment advocates, critics express grave concerns regarding potential increases in gun violence. As this new legal landscape unfolds, the ramifications of this settlement are likely to shape future legislative discussions and fuel ongoing debates over the balance between gun rights and public safety.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What are forced-reset triggers?

Forced-reset triggers are aftermarket devices that enable semiautomatic rifles to fire more rapidly by resetting the firing mechanism in a way that mimics automatic firing when the trigger is pulled.

Question: How did the settlement change the legality of forced-reset triggers?

The settlement officially allows for the sale and distribution of forced-reset triggers, which were previously classified as illegal machine gun conversion devices under federal law.

Question: What concerns do gun control advocates have regarding this settlement?

Gun control advocates worry that legalizing forced-reset triggers could lead to increased instances of gun violence, as these devices enable rapid-fire capabilities similar to automatic weapons.

administration ban Congress Crime devices Economy Education Elections Environmental Issues fire Healthcare Immigration Increasing lifts Natural Disasters Politics Public Policy rate Rifle Social Issues Supreme Court Technology Trump White House
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp Copy Link Bluesky
News Editor
  • Website

As the News Editor at News Journos, I am dedicated to curating and delivering the latest and most impactful stories across business, finance, politics, technology, and global affairs. With a commitment to journalistic integrity, we provide breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert insights to keep our readers informed in an ever-changing world. News Journos is your go-to independent news source, ensuring fast, accurate, and reliable reporting on the topics that matter most.

Keep Reading

U.S. News

NYPD Arrests Six During Protest Outside Tech Firm Office

6 Mins Read
U.S. News

Tesla Manufacturing Chief Omead Afshar Dismissed by Elon Musk

5 Mins Read
U.S. News

Rubrik Acquires AI Startup Predibase for Over $100 Million

5 Mins Read
U.S. News

Louisiana Offers Extensive Incentives to Attract Major Data Center Investment

6 Mins Read
U.S. News

Dozens Arrested on Capitol Hill During Medicaid Cuts Protest

5 Mins Read
U.S. News

Iran’s Nuclear Program Incurs Significant Damage

6 Mins Read
Mr Serdar Avatar

Serdar Imren

News Director

Facebook Twitter Instagram
Journalism Under Siege
Editors Picks

Arson, Gunfire, and Vandalism Target Tesla Vehicles and Dealerships, FBI Reports

March 21, 2025

Germany Criticizes Trump’s Tariff on U.S. Auto Imports

March 27, 2025

Trump to Sign Executive Order Targeting ‘Sanctuary’ Jurisdictions

April 28, 2025

Trump Addresses Speculation About Potential Third Presidential Run

May 4, 2025

Trump Administration and Bukele Reject Possibility of Return

April 14, 2025

Subscribe to News

Get the latest sports news from NewsSite about world, sports and politics.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest Vimeo WhatsApp TikTok Instagram

News

  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Money Watch

Journos

  • Top Stories
  • Turkey Reports
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Sports
  • Entertainment

COMPANY

  • About Us
  • Get In Touch
  • Our Authors
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Accessibility

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

© 2025 The News Journos. Designed by The News Journos.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.