Close Menu
News JournosNews Journos
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Latest Headlines:
  • Nvidia’s Jensen Huang Courts Beijing Amid Renewed Market Access in China
  • Volcanic Eruption in Iceland Forces Evacuation of Tourists from Blue Lagoon as Lava Approaches Grindavik
  • Humanity Faces Significant Losses, Says Spokesperson
  • Gun Seller Backed by Donald Trump Jr. Launches Stock Trading
  • Lightning Strike in New Jersey Leaves 1 Dead, 13 Injured
  • Used EV Batteries Poised to Power AI Growth
  • UK Inflation Data Reveals Key Trends for June
  • Hijacked Small Plane Grounds Flights at Vancouver International Airport
  • Experts Warn of Vulnerabilities in Federal E-Verify System Following Workplace Raids
  • Trial Commences Over Alleged Facebook Privacy Violations Involving CEO and Others
  • Controversy Surrounds Franco-Israeli Singer Amir at Francofolies de Spa Festival
  • Newsom Criticizes Trump’s National Guard Move, Urges Maturity
  • Potential Consequences of Trump’s Dismissal of Fed Chair Powell
  • Prince Harry Honors Diana’s Legacy by Advocating Against Landmines in Angola
  • Tsunami Warning Lowered to Advisory Following 7.2 Magnitude Earthquake near Alaska
  • Goldman Sachs Reports Q2 2025 Earnings Results
  • Rubio Calls Israeli Strike on Damascus a ‘Misunderstanding’ Amid Peace Efforts
  • Complete Skeleton of Medieval Knight Discovered Beneath Former Ice Cream Parlor in Poland
  • James Gunn Discusses “Superman”: Release Date, Character’s Immigrant Story, and Themes of Kindness
  • Assembly Discusses Olive Grove; Tanal’s Brief Action Sparks Varank’s Controversial Remarks
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
News JournosNews Journos
Subscribe
Monday, August 4
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
News JournosNews Journos
Trump Administration Reduces USAID Foreign Aid Contracts by 90%

Trump Administration Reduces USAID Foreign Aid Contracts by 90%

News EditorBy News EditorFebruary 27, 2025 Politics 6 Mins Read

In a sweeping move, the Trump administration is reportedly planning to slash nearly 15,000 grants worth $60 billion at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). The reduction will eliminate approximately 90% of the foreign aid contracts overseen by the agency. This directive follows a review of spending by the State Department and reflects the administration’s longstanding criticism of overseas spending that President Trump and many of his Republican allies have deemed ineffective for American taxpayers.

Article Subheadings
1) Overview of the Proposed Cuts to USAID
2) The Rationale Behind the Reductions
3) Reactions from Political Stakeholders
4) The Future of USAID Under Trump’s Administration
5) Implications for Global Aid and Development

Overview of the Proposed Cuts to USAID

The Trump administration’s proposed cuts target approximately 15,000 USAID grants, which amount to over $60 billion. These grants represent a significant portion of the agency’s financial commitments abroad, as they encompass about 90% of the contracts issued in foreign aid. The decision to eliminate these contracts arose from ongoing budget reviews initiated by the State Department aimed at addressing perceived inefficiencies within USAID. The proposed cuts follow a recent federal court order that mandated the Trump administration to expedite the disbursement of foreign aid funds before a deadline, prompting rapid action from the administration to streamline these programs.

According to internal documents, the administration plans to cut a staggering 5,800 out of 6,200 multi-year USAID contract awards, resulting in a $54 billion reduction. Alongside this, an additional 4,100 State Department grants are expected to be terminated, which would contribute to roughly a $4.4 billion decrease in funding. This drastic step has been characterized by the administration as a means to eradicate longstanding waste and inequities within the agency’s operational framework.

The Rationale Behind the Reductions

The rationale for the cuts stems predominantly from a critical viewpoint held by the Trump administration regarding the effectiveness of foreign aid. President Trump has frequently criticized overseas funding, asserting that it fails to provide tangible benefits to American taxpayers. This perspective is echoed by many Republicans, including members of Congress who have advocated for a more centralized and efficient approach to foreign aid management through the State Department.

Further backing the administration’s motivation are claims of systemic waste and inefficiency within USAID. The administration touts these cuts as an opportunity to realign foreign assistance operations in a manner that purportedly prioritizes taxpayer interests. In an internal memo, the State Department described the initiative as a necessary overhaul meant to correct “decades of institutional drift.” This phrase has become a talking point that suggests a fundamental reassessment of how U.S. foreign aid should be distributed and managed moving forward.

Reactions from Political Stakeholders

The announcement of cuts met with significant backlash from various political quarters. Democrats point out the critical role that USAID plays in not only easing suffering globally but also in fostering favorable conditions abroad that ultimately safeguard U.S. interests. They argue that foreign aid promotes stability in regions that may otherwise descend into chaos, which could have direct implications for national security and global health.

Conversely, Republicans have praised the proposed reductions, citing numerous instances of perceived misuse of funds. Senator Joni Ernst from Iowa has highlighted specific projects funded by USAID that she deems unnecessary, underscoring the sentiment of conservatives who wish to see what they perceive as inefficient or ideologically driven initiatives curtailed. Furthermore, influential figures such as Elon Musk have voiced their support for these changes, with Musk suggesting that USAID represents significant flaws inherent in government funding practices.

The Future of USAID Under Trump’s Administration

Looking ahead, the landscape of USAID is poised for dramatic transformation as the Trump administration implements these cuts. In addition to reducing the number of funded programs, the administration has signaled intentions to significantly decrease the workforce within the agency, aiming to operate with fewer than 300 staff members, down from the current 8,000 direct hires and contractors. This severe downsizing raises questions about the agency’s capability to fulfill its mission with such limited personnel.

In a further signal of major administrative changes, Secretary of State Marco Rubio has recently confirmed his role as the acting chief of USAID. This appointment indicates a concerted effort to reshape the agency’s structure and responsibilities in alignment with the administration’s broader agenda, fundamentally altering how foreign aid will be managed in the near future.

Implications for Global Aid and Development

The implications of the proposed cuts carry significant weight on both domestic and international fronts. For developing countries that rely on U.S. aid for humanitarian assistance, the elimination of grants can lead to increased poverty, health crises, and instability. Many critics argue that the reduction in U.S. aid may exacerbate existing challenges in low-income regions, hindering progress toward sustainable development goals globally.

From a global perspective, these cuts could redefine the U.S.’s role as a leader in international aid. While proponents argue that reallocating such vast resources back to domestic priorities is essential for American interests, the potential fallout could undermine long-standing diplomatic relationships and diminish U.S. influence in regions where aid is critical. As countries grapple with their socioeconomic challenges, the absence of U.S. support may lead them to seek assistance from other nations, potentially adversarial to U.S. interests.

No. Key Points
1 The Trump administration plans to cut nearly 15,000 grants from USAID worth $60 billion.
2 The reductions equate to approximately 90% of USAID’s foreign aid contracts.
3 Critics argue that cuts will adversely affect global humanitarian efforts and stability.
4 Republicans support cuts, citing wastefulness and ideological reasons behind USAID funding.
5 The future structure of USAID will see a significant staff reduction alongside the cuts.

Summary

The proposed cuts to USAID signify a pivotal moment in U.S. foreign aid policy, potentially reshaping the framework in which the country engages with the global community. While supporters of the policy argue it represents a necessary reevaluation of spending priorities, the potential repercussions for international stability and humanitarian efforts have sparked a heated debate among political leaders and constituents alike. As the administration moves forward with these plans, the implications for both the agency and the U.S.’s role in global affairs remain to be seen.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What is the primary goal of USAID?

The primary goal of USAID is to provide economic, development, and humanitarian assistance around the world, particularly in countries facing poverty and instability.

Question: How will the cuts to USAID impact international relations?

The cuts to USAID could potentially harm U.S. relationships with developing countries, as they rely on American aid for stability and support, possibly leading to a decrease in U.S. influence in those regions.

Question: Why does the Trump administration believe these cuts are necessary?

The Trump administration views these cuts as essential for eliminating waste, improving efficiency, and redirecting funding towards domestic interests rather than what they perceive as ineffective foreign spending.

administration Aid Bipartisan Negotiations Congressional Debates Contracts Election Campaigns Executive Orders Federal Budget Foreign Healthcare Policy House of Representatives Immigration Reform Legislative Process Lobbying Activities National Security Party Platforms Political Fundraising Presidential Agenda Public Policy Reduces Senate Hearings Supreme Court Decisions Tax Legislation Trump USAID Voter Turnout
News Editor
  • Website

As the News Editor at News Journos, I am dedicated to curating and delivering the latest and most impactful stories across business, finance, politics, technology, and global affairs. With a commitment to journalistic integrity, we provide breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert insights to keep our readers informed in an ever-changing world. News Journos is your go-to independent news source, ensuring fast, accurate, and reliable reporting on the topics that matter most.

Keep Reading

Politics

Experts Warn of Vulnerabilities in Federal E-Verify System Following Workplace Raids

7 Mins Read
Politics

Michelle Obama Addresses Divorce Rumors: “Never Considered Quitting My Man”

5 Mins Read
Politics

Trump Discusses Firing Fed Chair Powell with GOP Lawmakers

5 Mins Read
Politics

Critics Claim Trump’s Presidential Library Fundraising Lacks Oversight

6 Mins Read
Politics

Trump Administration Transfers Violent Criminal Deportees to Eswatini

7 Mins Read
Politics

Grijalva Claims Arizona Democratic House Primary; Butierez Secures GOP Nomination

6 Mins Read
Mr Serdar Avatar

Serdar Imren

News Director

Facebook Twitter Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • About Us
  • Get In Touch
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • Terms and Conditions
© 2025 The News Journos. Designed by The News Journos.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.