Close Menu
News JournosNews Journos
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
Editors Picks

Trump Expresses Disappointment Over Russian Rocket Strikes on Ukraine, Blames Obama for Crimea Situation

April 27, 2025

Trump Proposes El Salvador Prison Time for Suspects in Tesla Arson Attack

March 22, 2025

Democrats Split on Wisconsin Judge and Trump Impeachment Perspectives

April 25, 2025

Clinton Criticizes Trump and Officials Over Signal Text Leak

March 31, 2025

Trump Aware of Israel’s Planned Strikes on Iran in Advance

June 13, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Latest Headlines:
  • China’s Perspective on the Escalating Iran-Israel Conflict
  • Pakistan Commends Trump on India Peace Efforts, Criticizes Iran Airstrikes
  • Israel-Iran Standoff Escalates: Key Developments and Future Implications
  • Supreme Court Allows Trump to Restart Deportations to Third Countries
  • Florida Asks Supreme Court to Uphold Strict New Immigration Law
  • Ukrainian Journalist Released from Russian Custody in Occupied Crimea
  • GOP Applauds Israel-Iran Ceasefire; Democrats Remain Neutral
  • Iran Targets U.S. Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar: Key Facts and Context
  • Florida Secures Federal Funds for Immigration Detention Facilities, Including “Alligator Alcatraz”
  • U.S. Insurers Revamp Approval Process Across Multiple Platforms
  • CHP Protests Outside Ministry of Justice
  • Potential Successors to Khamenei Identified Amid Iranian Leadership Talks
  • Congress Divided Over Trump’s Iran Strike and War Powers Debate
  • NHTSA Expresses Concern Over Tesla Robotaxi Incidents Caught on Camera in Austin
  • Ceasefire Reached Between Israel and Iran After 12 Days of Conflict
  • Trump Mediates Ceasefire Agreement Between Israel and Iran
  • Pro Athletes Gain Business Skills through Immersion Program
  • Stocks to Watch: TSLA, NTRS, DASH, XOM, and Others
  • JetBlue to Cease Operations at Miami International Airport
  • Top 5 Scams That Are Costing Victims Thousands
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
News JournosNews Journos
Subscribe
Monday, June 23
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
News JournosNews Journos
You are here: News Journos » Politics » Trump Administration Reduces USAID Foreign Aid Contracts by 90%
Trump Administration Reduces USAID Foreign Aid Contracts by 90%

Trump Administration Reduces USAID Foreign Aid Contracts by 90%

News EditorBy News EditorFebruary 27, 2025 Politics 6 Mins Read

In a sweeping move, the Trump administration is reportedly planning to slash nearly 15,000 grants worth $60 billion at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). The reduction will eliminate approximately 90% of the foreign aid contracts overseen by the agency. This directive follows a review of spending by the State Department and reflects the administration’s longstanding criticism of overseas spending that President Trump and many of his Republican allies have deemed ineffective for American taxpayers.

Article Subheadings
1) Overview of the Proposed Cuts to USAID
2) The Rationale Behind the Reductions
3) Reactions from Political Stakeholders
4) The Future of USAID Under Trump’s Administration
5) Implications for Global Aid and Development

Overview of the Proposed Cuts to USAID

The Trump administration’s proposed cuts target approximately 15,000 USAID grants, which amount to over $60 billion. These grants represent a significant portion of the agency’s financial commitments abroad, as they encompass about 90% of the contracts issued in foreign aid. The decision to eliminate these contracts arose from ongoing budget reviews initiated by the State Department aimed at addressing perceived inefficiencies within USAID. The proposed cuts follow a recent federal court order that mandated the Trump administration to expedite the disbursement of foreign aid funds before a deadline, prompting rapid action from the administration to streamline these programs.

According to internal documents, the administration plans to cut a staggering 5,800 out of 6,200 multi-year USAID contract awards, resulting in a $54 billion reduction. Alongside this, an additional 4,100 State Department grants are expected to be terminated, which would contribute to roughly a $4.4 billion decrease in funding. This drastic step has been characterized by the administration as a means to eradicate longstanding waste and inequities within the agency’s operational framework.

The Rationale Behind the Reductions

The rationale for the cuts stems predominantly from a critical viewpoint held by the Trump administration regarding the effectiveness of foreign aid. President Trump has frequently criticized overseas funding, asserting that it fails to provide tangible benefits to American taxpayers. This perspective is echoed by many Republicans, including members of Congress who have advocated for a more centralized and efficient approach to foreign aid management through the State Department.

Further backing the administration’s motivation are claims of systemic waste and inefficiency within USAID. The administration touts these cuts as an opportunity to realign foreign assistance operations in a manner that purportedly prioritizes taxpayer interests. In an internal memo, the State Department described the initiative as a necessary overhaul meant to correct “decades of institutional drift.” This phrase has become a talking point that suggests a fundamental reassessment of how U.S. foreign aid should be distributed and managed moving forward.

Reactions from Political Stakeholders

The announcement of cuts met with significant backlash from various political quarters. Democrats point out the critical role that USAID plays in not only easing suffering globally but also in fostering favorable conditions abroad that ultimately safeguard U.S. interests. They argue that foreign aid promotes stability in regions that may otherwise descend into chaos, which could have direct implications for national security and global health.

Conversely, Republicans have praised the proposed reductions, citing numerous instances of perceived misuse of funds. Senator Joni Ernst from Iowa has highlighted specific projects funded by USAID that she deems unnecessary, underscoring the sentiment of conservatives who wish to see what they perceive as inefficient or ideologically driven initiatives curtailed. Furthermore, influential figures such as Elon Musk have voiced their support for these changes, with Musk suggesting that USAID represents significant flaws inherent in government funding practices.

The Future of USAID Under Trump’s Administration

Looking ahead, the landscape of USAID is poised for dramatic transformation as the Trump administration implements these cuts. In addition to reducing the number of funded programs, the administration has signaled intentions to significantly decrease the workforce within the agency, aiming to operate with fewer than 300 staff members, down from the current 8,000 direct hires and contractors. This severe downsizing raises questions about the agency’s capability to fulfill its mission with such limited personnel.

In a further signal of major administrative changes, Secretary of State Marco Rubio has recently confirmed his role as the acting chief of USAID. This appointment indicates a concerted effort to reshape the agency’s structure and responsibilities in alignment with the administration’s broader agenda, fundamentally altering how foreign aid will be managed in the near future.

Implications for Global Aid and Development

The implications of the proposed cuts carry significant weight on both domestic and international fronts. For developing countries that rely on U.S. aid for humanitarian assistance, the elimination of grants can lead to increased poverty, health crises, and instability. Many critics argue that the reduction in U.S. aid may exacerbate existing challenges in low-income regions, hindering progress toward sustainable development goals globally.

From a global perspective, these cuts could redefine the U.S.’s role as a leader in international aid. While proponents argue that reallocating such vast resources back to domestic priorities is essential for American interests, the potential fallout could undermine long-standing diplomatic relationships and diminish U.S. influence in regions where aid is critical. As countries grapple with their socioeconomic challenges, the absence of U.S. support may lead them to seek assistance from other nations, potentially adversarial to U.S. interests.

No. Key Points
1 The Trump administration plans to cut nearly 15,000 grants from USAID worth $60 billion.
2 The reductions equate to approximately 90% of USAID’s foreign aid contracts.
3 Critics argue that cuts will adversely affect global humanitarian efforts and stability.
4 Republicans support cuts, citing wastefulness and ideological reasons behind USAID funding.
5 The future structure of USAID will see a significant staff reduction alongside the cuts.

Summary

The proposed cuts to USAID signify a pivotal moment in U.S. foreign aid policy, potentially reshaping the framework in which the country engages with the global community. While supporters of the policy argue it represents a necessary reevaluation of spending priorities, the potential repercussions for international stability and humanitarian efforts have sparked a heated debate among political leaders and constituents alike. As the administration moves forward with these plans, the implications for both the agency and the U.S.’s role in global affairs remain to be seen.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What is the primary goal of USAID?

The primary goal of USAID is to provide economic, development, and humanitarian assistance around the world, particularly in countries facing poverty and instability.

Question: How will the cuts to USAID impact international relations?

The cuts to USAID could potentially harm U.S. relationships with developing countries, as they rely on American aid for stability and support, possibly leading to a decrease in U.S. influence in those regions.

Question: Why does the Trump administration believe these cuts are necessary?

The Trump administration views these cuts as essential for eliminating waste, improving efficiency, and redirecting funding towards domestic interests rather than what they perceive as ineffective foreign spending.

administration Aid Bipartisan Negotiations Congressional Debates Contracts Election Campaigns Executive Orders Federal Budget Foreign Healthcare Policy House of Representatives Immigration Reform Legislative Process Lobbying Activities National Security Party Platforms Political Fundraising Presidential Agenda Public Policy Reduces Senate Hearings Supreme Court Decisions Tax Legislation Trump USAID Voter Turnout
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp Copy Link Bluesky
News Editor
  • Website

As the News Editor at News Journos, I am dedicated to curating and delivering the latest and most impactful stories across business, finance, politics, technology, and global affairs. With a commitment to journalistic integrity, we provide breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert insights to keep our readers informed in an ever-changing world. News Journos is your go-to independent news source, ensuring fast, accurate, and reliable reporting on the topics that matter most.

Keep Reading

Politics

Florida Asks Supreme Court to Uphold Strict New Immigration Law

6 Mins Read
Politics

Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Deportations to Third Countries Without Notification

5 Mins Read
Politics

Supreme Court Considers Rastafarian Inmate’s Lawsuit Over Dreadlocks Cut by Prison Officials

6 Mins Read
Politics

Rubio Discusses Foreign Policy on National Broadcast

6 Mins Read
Politics

Sen. Tim Kaine Discusses Key Issues on National Broadcast

6 Mins Read
Politics

B-2 Bombers Complete Mission in Iran, Return to Missouri

5 Mins Read
Mr Serdar Avatar

Serdar Imren

News Director

Facebook Twitter Instagram
Journalism Under Siege
Editors Picks

Democrats Avoid Labeling Tesla Attacks as ‘Domestic Terrorism’

April 5, 2025

Trump Media sues Brazil justice who crossed Elon Musk

February 19, 2025

States Across the U.S. Implement Universal School Choice Policies

April 24, 2025

U.S. and China to Temporarily Reduce Tariffs for 90 Days

May 12, 2025

AOC Avoids Blame for Democratic Rhetoric Amid Tesla Attacks

April 2, 2025

Subscribe to News

Get the latest sports news from NewsSite about world, sports and politics.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest Vimeo WhatsApp TikTok Instagram

News

  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Money Watch

Journos

  • Top Stories
  • Turkey Reports
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Sports
  • Entertainment

COMPANY

  • About Us
  • Get In Touch
  • Our Authors
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Accessibility

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

© 2025 The News Journos. Designed by The News Journos.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.