Close Menu
News JournosNews Journos
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
Editors Picks

Chinese National Smuggles ‘Agroterrorism’ Pathogen into U.S. in Boots

June 4, 2025

Trump Administration Criticizes Media for Depiction of Deported Criminals

April 24, 2025

Trump Invites Rand Paul to Picnic After Rescinded White House Offer

June 12, 2025

Trump Declares U.S. Steel Partnership with Nippon Steel

May 23, 2025

Trump and Judiciary Face Escalating Conflicts

May 16, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Latest Headlines:
  • Senate Moves to Advance Key Legislation Ahead of July 4 Deadline
  • Bears Break Out of Wildlife Park, Consume Honey Supply Before Napping
  • CD vs. High-Yield Savings Account: Which Investment Offers Higher Returns?
  • Prosecution and Defense Conclude Arguments in Sean Combs Sex Trafficking and Racketeering Trial
  • Back-to-School Spending Remains Strong, Survey Finds
  • Exiled Iranian Prince Advocates for Regime Change, Declares ‘Berlin Wall Moment’
  • Darica Mayor Muzaffer Bıyık Shot in Office Attack
  • Journalists End 20-Day Protest After Wage Agreement Reached
  • Midday Stock Highlights: UBER, CCL, AAP, and SNOW See Significant Moves
  • Republicans Propose Bill Requiring Postal Service to Sell New Electric Mail Trucks
  • NATO Race for Defense Technology: Strategies to Maintain a Competitive Edge
  • European Health Agency Alerts Travelers to Rising Hepatitis A Cases
  • U.N. Agency Criticizes U.S.-Backed Gaza Aid as “Death Trap” Amid Rising Casualties
  • Home Price Increases Slow More Than Anticipated
  • UN Chief Praises Trump Following Israel-Iran Ceasefire Announcement
  • Six Common Illegal Debt Collection Tactics to Beware Of
  • McDonald’s and Krispy Kreme End Doughnut Collaboration
  • Majority of Americans Believe Six-Figure Income is Necessary for Financial Security
  • Brazilian Tourist Found Dead After Fall at Indonesian Volcano
  • Health Data Sold Without User Consent Across Multiple Platforms
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
News JournosNews Journos
Subscribe
Tuesday, June 24
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
News JournosNews Journos
You are here: News Journos » Politics » Trump Ends Secret Service Protection for Biden Children
Trump Ends Secret Service Protection for Biden Children

Trump Ends Secret Service Protection for Biden Children

News EditorBy News EditorMarch 18, 2025 Politics 5 Mins Read

In a striking announcement, former President Donald Trump declared on Monday the immediate revocation of Secret Service protection for former President Joe Biden‘s son, Hunter Biden, and his daughter, Ashley Biden. The protection, which had been a source of taxpayer expense, will see a significant reduction in personnel dedicated to both individuals. This decision raises various questions about the implications of ending protective details for former leaders’ families, as well as the precedents set by previous administrations in offering security to their relatives.

Article Subheadings
1) Trump’s Decision and Its Rationale
2) Secret Service Protocols and Presidential Protections
3) Historical Context of Extended Protection
4) Financial Implications of Protective Details
5) Reaction from Political Experts

Trump’s Decision and Its Rationale

On a Monday announcement, the former president expressed his intent to cease federal protection for Hunter Biden and Ashley Biden by stating that having Secret Service agents for them was “ridiculous.” Notably, Trump emphasized that the protection, funded by taxpayers, involved numerous personnel, referring to the presence of 18 agents dedicated to his son alone. The former president highlighted that while Hunter Biden was reportedly on vacation in South Africa, there were still extensive resources allocated to his security. This proclamation raises concerns regarding the safety of public figures and their families once they are no longer in office.

Secret Service Protocols and Presidential Protections

The Secret Service is mandated to provide protection to sitting U.S. presidents and their immediate families, which typically extends beyond their time in office for former presidents themselves and their spouses. Under normal circumstances, the protection for the children of former presidents ends once they are no longer occupying the White House. However, it is suggested that presidents can extend protective measures until specific milestones are reached, often influenced by the political climate and public interest. The agency’s Chief of Communications, Anthony Guglielmi, confirmed readiness to comply with Trump’s directive while coordinating methods to reallocate security resources.

Historical Context of Extended Protection

Historically, several U.S. presidents have opted to extend Secret Service protection for their adult children after their terms end. Such measures are typically enacted through executive orders or other formal decisions. For instance, Donald Trump’s children received additional protection well after he assumed the presidency, illustrating a common practice that bridges personal belief in familial safety with political capital. This extension has been noted in past administrations, where successors similarly sought to ensure their families remained secure in the public eye.

Financial Implications of Protective Details

The costs associated with providing Secret Service details for former presidents’ families have come under scrutiny in various discussions. A watchdog group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, reported that the expenses linked to former President Trump’s children’s travels accrued significant sums shortly after he departed the Oval Office. These financial obligations can add up quickly, raising questions about the responsibility borne by taxpayers for the security of public figures and their families.

Reaction from Political Experts

Political analysts and security experts have weighed in on the decision to revoke protection for the Biden family. Some argue that the action could set a concerning precedent, highlighting issues related to safety and the responsibilities leaders owe to their families after leaving office. Conversely, others propose that such decisions rightfully reflect fiscal accountability during challenging economic times, indicating a need for better resource management within government agencies. Overall, the implications provoke a broader discussion about the safety of public figures, the role of the government in ensuring their security, and the expectations surrounding families of elected officials.

No. Key Points
1 Former President Trump announced the immediate termination of Secret Service protection for Hunter and Ashley Biden.
2 The decision raises questions about protections for former leaders’ families.
3 Secret Service protection for former presidents typically lasts for life, but it can be adjusted by the incumbent.
4 Previous administrations have extended protection for their children, highlighting a common practice.
5 The financial implications of protective details are significant, leading to concerns about taxpayer funding.

Summary

The recent announcement by Donald Trump to revoke Secret Service protection for Hunter and Ashley Biden has stirred significant discourse regarding the safety of former presidential families. As the political landscape continues to evolve, the decisions surrounding security measures illustrate the complexities facing former leaders and their families, heralding a need for dialogue on personal security in the public sphere. The ramifications may influence future policies regarding the safety and financing of protections within federal purview.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: Why did Trump revoke Secret Service protection for the Bidens?

Former President Trump claimed that the protection of Hunter and Ashley Biden involved excessive taxpayer expenditure and described the allocation of agents as unreasonable.

Question: What does ending Secret Service protection mean for the Bidens?

Revoking protection signifies that the Bidens will no longer receive federal security measures, which could impact their safety and privacy as public figures.

Question: How long does Secret Service protection typically last for former presidents’ families?

Generally, Secret Service protection continues for life for former presidents and their spouses; however, protection for their children typically ceases once they are no longer in the White House.

Biden Bipartisan Negotiations children Congressional Debates Election Campaigns Ends Executive Orders Federal Budget Healthcare Policy House of Representatives Immigration Reform Legislative Process Lobbying Activities National Security Party Platforms Political Fundraising Presidential Agenda protection Public Policy Secret Senate Hearings service Supreme Court Decisions Tax Legislation Trump Voter Turnout
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp Copy Link Bluesky
News Editor
  • Website

As the News Editor at News Journos, I am dedicated to curating and delivering the latest and most impactful stories across business, finance, politics, technology, and global affairs. With a commitment to journalistic integrity, we provide breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert insights to keep our readers informed in an ever-changing world. News Journos is your go-to independent news source, ensuring fast, accurate, and reliable reporting on the topics that matter most.

Keep Reading

Politics

Republicans Propose Bill Requiring Postal Service to Sell New Electric Mail Trucks

7 Mins Read
Politics

Fed Chair Powell Maintains Steady Interest Rates Amid Calls for Cuts

5 Mins Read
Politics

Democrats to Select New Ranking Member for House Oversight Committee Following Rep. Connolly’s Passing

6 Mins Read
Politics

Trump Claims Iran Provided Advance Warning of Counterstrikes on U.S. Base in Qatar

5 Mins Read
Politics

Florida Asks Supreme Court to Uphold Strict New Immigration Law

6 Mins Read
Politics

Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Deportations to Third Countries Without Notification

5 Mins Read
Mr Serdar Avatar

Serdar Imren

News Director

Facebook Twitter Instagram
Journalism Under Siege
Editors Picks

Clinton Criticizes Trump and Officials Over Signal Text Leak

March 31, 2025

Schiff Blocks Martin’s Nomination as D.C. U.S. Attorney

April 1, 2025

Trump Issues Executive Order Halting Taxpayer Funding for Illegal Immigration

February 20, 2025

Wisconsin Voters Reject Trump and Musk as Liberals Secure State Supreme Court Seat

April 2, 2025

U.S. Institute of Peace Leaders Reassume Control After Court Nullifies DOGE Takeover

May 21, 2025

Subscribe to News

Get the latest sports news from NewsSite about world, sports and politics.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest Vimeo WhatsApp TikTok Instagram

News

  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Money Watch

Journos

  • Top Stories
  • Turkey Reports
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Sports
  • Entertainment

COMPANY

  • About Us
  • Get In Touch
  • Our Authors
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Accessibility

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

© 2025 The News Journos. Designed by The News Journos.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.