Close Menu
News JournosNews Journos
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Latest Headlines:
  • Nvidia’s Jensen Huang Courts Beijing Amid Renewed Market Access in China
  • Volcanic Eruption in Iceland Forces Evacuation of Tourists from Blue Lagoon as Lava Approaches Grindavik
  • Humanity Faces Significant Losses, Says Spokesperson
  • Gun Seller Backed by Donald Trump Jr. Launches Stock Trading
  • Lightning Strike in New Jersey Leaves 1 Dead, 13 Injured
  • Used EV Batteries Poised to Power AI Growth
  • UK Inflation Data Reveals Key Trends for June
  • Hijacked Small Plane Grounds Flights at Vancouver International Airport
  • Experts Warn of Vulnerabilities in Federal E-Verify System Following Workplace Raids
  • Trial Commences Over Alleged Facebook Privacy Violations Involving CEO and Others
  • Controversy Surrounds Franco-Israeli Singer Amir at Francofolies de Spa Festival
  • Newsom Criticizes Trump’s National Guard Move, Urges Maturity
  • Potential Consequences of Trump’s Dismissal of Fed Chair Powell
  • Prince Harry Honors Diana’s Legacy by Advocating Against Landmines in Angola
  • Tsunami Warning Lowered to Advisory Following 7.2 Magnitude Earthquake near Alaska
  • Goldman Sachs Reports Q2 2025 Earnings Results
  • Rubio Calls Israeli Strike on Damascus a ‘Misunderstanding’ Amid Peace Efforts
  • Complete Skeleton of Medieval Knight Discovered Beneath Former Ice Cream Parlor in Poland
  • James Gunn Discusses “Superman”: Release Date, Character’s Immigrant Story, and Themes of Kindness
  • Assembly Discusses Olive Grove; Tanal’s Brief Action Sparks Varank’s Controversial Remarks
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
News JournosNews Journos
Subscribe
Saturday, July 26
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
News JournosNews Journos
Trump Gains Control of California National Guard Following Appeals Court Ruling

Trump Gains Control of California National Guard Following Appeals Court Ruling

News EditorBy News EditorJune 13, 2025 U.S. News 5 Mins Read

A federal appeals court intervened late Thursday, blocking an order from a lower court compelling President Donald Trump to return control of approximately 4,000 California National Guard troops to Governor Gavin Newsom. The ruling followed U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer‘s decision that deemed the federalization of the troops illegal. As the Trump administration aimed to appeal this decision, the Ninth Circuit scheduled a hearing for the upcoming Tuesday to discuss the matter further.

Article Subheadings
1) The Federal Appeals Court Decision
2) Background of the Troops’ Federalization
3) Legal Arguments Presented in Court
4) Reactions from Both Sides
5) Implications of the Ruling

The Federal Appeals Court Decision

Late Thursday, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals granted a temporary stay against U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer‘s ruling, which had ordered President Donald Trump to relinquish control of the California National Guard back to Governor Gavin Newsom. Judge Breyer had determined that the federalization of the troops was unconstitutional and lacked necessary legal grounds. The appeals court’s quick response allows the federal administration additional time to appeal the decision, and a hearing has been set for Tuesday to reconsider Breyer’s order.

Background of the Troops’ Federalization

The situation began when President Trump federalized approximately 4,000 members of the California National Guard alongside an additional 700 U.S. Marines. This move came in response to widespread protests in Los Angeles against federal immigration enforcement actions. Notably, the federal mobilization of military forces in response to unrest is a significant and contentious action within American political and legal frameworks. Newsom, alongside California’s Attorney General, mobilized legal efforts to contest Trump’s authority to make such a decision without state consent, marking a historical precedent where a president leveraged special provisions for federalization without governor approval.

Legal Arguments Presented in Court

In Judge Breyer‘s order, he expressed skepticism regarding the rationale provided by federal attorneys defending Trump‘s actions. During a hearing, Breyer emphasized that a constitutional balance must be maintained and questioned the legitimacy of the federal government’s claims. The judge pointed out that the protests in Los Angeles did not meet the threshold for conditions that justify the federalization of state guard units, which include situations of invasion or rebellion, asserting that “the protests fall far short of ‘rebellion.’” Furthermore, Judge Breyer argued that Trump‘s actions threatened to disrupt the established power dynamics between state and federal authorities.

Reactions from Both Sides

Following the appellate court’s decision, Trump expressed his satisfaction with a social media post that highlighted the urgent need for military presence in Los Angeles, framing it as an essential action for public safety. He noted that without military intervention, the city would have been in serious turmoil. On the opposing side, Newsom praised Judge Breyer’s initial ruling, asserting that it represented a significant check on executive power, denouncing the use of military forces in urban settings. Newsom used symbolic imagery in social media to emphasize the distinction between battlefield operations and city policing, aiming to instill a sense of responsibility regarding military deployment.

Implications of the Ruling

The implications of this legal battle extend beyond California, potentially setting a precedent for how future administrations might interact with state forces. If the Ninth Circuit ultimately sides with Judge Breyer, it could reinstate critical checks and balances in state-federal relations, especially regarding military involvement in civilian affairs. The ruling addresses larger concerns about presidential overreach and the militarization of urban environments, highlighted by Breyer’s assertion that Trump’s actions established a dangerous precedent. The upcoming hearing on Tuesday will play a pivotal role in shaping the trajectory of this legislative clash.

No. Key Points
1 The Ninth Circuit temporarily blocked a ruling requiring President Trump to return control of the National Guard to Governor Newsom.
2 Judge Breyer deemed Trump’s actions illegal and lacking necessary legal justification.
3 The federalization of troops was in response to protests against immigration enforcement in Los Angeles.
4 Both sides expressed their views on the ruling, highlighting tensions between state and federal powers.
5 Implications of this ruling could impact future interactions between state and federal authorities regarding military deployments.

Summary

In conclusion, the recent decision by the Ninth Circuit showcases a crucial moment in the ongoing debate concerning the extent of presidential authority over state resources. As the situation unfolds, the outcome of next week’s hearing could have lasting repercussions not only for California but also for the balance of power between federal and state governments throughout the United States.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What are the grounds for federalizing the National Guard?

Federalizing the National Guard typically requires conditions such as an invasion or rebellion, or when the president is unable to execute U.S. laws. Judge Breyer argued that the protests in Los Angeles did not meet these criteria.

Question: Why did Judge Breyer rule against President Trump?

Judge Breyer ruled against President Trump because he found that the federalization of the National Guard exceeded the president’s statutory authority and violated the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution.

Question: What were the reactions from Governor Newsom following the ruling?

Governor Newsom praised Judge Breyer’s ruling, describing it as a significant check on presidential power. He emphasized that military forces should not be deployed to city streets, framing the situation as a broader issue of executive overreach.

Appeals California Congress control Court Crime Economy Education Elections Environmental Issues Gains Guard Healthcare Immigration national Natural Disasters Politics Public Policy Ruling Social Issues Supreme Court Technology Trump White House
News Editor
  • Website

As the News Editor at News Journos, I am dedicated to curating and delivering the latest and most impactful stories across business, finance, politics, technology, and global affairs. With a commitment to journalistic integrity, we provide breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert insights to keep our readers informed in an ever-changing world. News Journos is your go-to independent news source, ensuring fast, accurate, and reliable reporting on the topics that matter most.

Keep Reading

U.S. News

Gun Seller Backed by Donald Trump Jr. Launches Stock Trading

7 Mins Read
U.S. News

Potential Consequences of Trump’s Dismissal of Fed Chair Powell

6 Mins Read
U.S. News

Crypto Legislation Stalled in Congress for Second Consecutive Day

7 Mins Read
U.S. News

Trump Dismisses Plans to Fire Powell, Calling Them ‘Highly Unlikely’

5 Mins Read
U.S. News

June 2025 PPI Inflation Report Highlights Key Economic Trends

4 Mins Read
U.S. News

Mortgage Demand Drops 10% Amid Rising Rates and Economic Worries

5 Mins Read
Mr Serdar Avatar

Serdar Imren

News Director

Facebook Twitter Instagram
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
  • About Us
  • Get In Touch
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility
  • Terms and Conditions
© 2025 The News Journos. Designed by The News Journos.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.