Close Menu
News JournosNews Journos
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
Editors Picks

Cybersecurity Agency Faces Major Setbacks Due to DOGE Reductions

March 8, 2025

Major Trades Signal Caution on U.S. Stocks

June 2, 2025

Trump Clarifies Musk’s White House Role Amid Major News Updates

April 4, 2025

Trump Urged to Request Elon Musk Certification for Restricted DOGE Data

May 21, 2025

Experts Claim Lawsuits Against DOGE Aim to Undermine Trump’s Agenda

March 1, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Latest Headlines:
  • What’s Open and Closed on July 4, 2025? Store and Business Hours Revealed.
  • Dozens Injured in Rome Gas Station Explosion
  • Apple’s F1 Achievement Overshadowed by AI Challenges
  • Gangs Control 90% of Port-au-Prince as Violence Escalates, Warns UN
  • Supreme Court Approves Deportation of Migrants from Djibouti to South Sudan
  • Poland Achieves Milestone with Renewables Surpassing Coal in Electricity Generation
  • Broadcaster Jabs Yankees Announcer After Blue Jays’ 4-Game Sweep
  • Miki Sudo Triumphs in 2025 Nathan’s Famous Hot Dog Eating Contest Women’s Division
  • 9 Key Strategies to Safeguard Your Phone and Recover from Hacks
  • North Korean Man Evades Military and Landmines to Enter South Korea
  • Bodrum Fire Erupts Following Çeşme Blaze
  • Experts Warn of North Korea-Style Repression in Iran Following Israel Conflict
  • İmamoğlu Risks Prison and Political Ban Following Diploma Revocation
  • Mammogram Costs Surge, Leaving Women with Unexpected Bills for Preventative Care
  • International LGBTQ+ Travelers Cut Back on U.S. Trips
  • London IPO Fundraising Reaches Lowest Level in 30 Years
  • How to Watch the 2025 Nathan’s Hot Dog Eating Contest on July 4
  • Russia Launches Largest Aerial Assault on Kyiv Amid Trump-Putin Discussion
  • Rare 2,000-Year-Old Shoes Discovered at Roman Site in Northern England
  • 2025 Food Trends: Beef Tallow, Mustard, and Flavored Olive Oil on the Rise
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
News JournosNews Journos
Subscribe
Friday, July 4
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
News JournosNews Journos
You are here: News Journos » U.S. News » Trump Gains Control of California National Guard Following Appeals Court Ruling
Trump Gains Control of California National Guard Following Appeals Court Ruling

Trump Gains Control of California National Guard Following Appeals Court Ruling

News EditorBy News EditorJune 13, 2025 U.S. News 5 Mins Read

A federal appeals court intervened late Thursday, blocking an order from a lower court compelling President Donald Trump to return control of approximately 4,000 California National Guard troops to Governor Gavin Newsom. The ruling followed U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer‘s decision that deemed the federalization of the troops illegal. As the Trump administration aimed to appeal this decision, the Ninth Circuit scheduled a hearing for the upcoming Tuesday to discuss the matter further.

Article Subheadings
1) The Federal Appeals Court Decision
2) Background of the Troops’ Federalization
3) Legal Arguments Presented in Court
4) Reactions from Both Sides
5) Implications of the Ruling

The Federal Appeals Court Decision

Late Thursday, the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals granted a temporary stay against U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer‘s ruling, which had ordered President Donald Trump to relinquish control of the California National Guard back to Governor Gavin Newsom. Judge Breyer had determined that the federalization of the troops was unconstitutional and lacked necessary legal grounds. The appeals court’s quick response allows the federal administration additional time to appeal the decision, and a hearing has been set for Tuesday to reconsider Breyer’s order.

Background of the Troops’ Federalization

The situation began when President Trump federalized approximately 4,000 members of the California National Guard alongside an additional 700 U.S. Marines. This move came in response to widespread protests in Los Angeles against federal immigration enforcement actions. Notably, the federal mobilization of military forces in response to unrest is a significant and contentious action within American political and legal frameworks. Newsom, alongside California’s Attorney General, mobilized legal efforts to contest Trump’s authority to make such a decision without state consent, marking a historical precedent where a president leveraged special provisions for federalization without governor approval.

Legal Arguments Presented in Court

In Judge Breyer‘s order, he expressed skepticism regarding the rationale provided by federal attorneys defending Trump‘s actions. During a hearing, Breyer emphasized that a constitutional balance must be maintained and questioned the legitimacy of the federal government’s claims. The judge pointed out that the protests in Los Angeles did not meet the threshold for conditions that justify the federalization of state guard units, which include situations of invasion or rebellion, asserting that “the protests fall far short of ‘rebellion.’” Furthermore, Judge Breyer argued that Trump‘s actions threatened to disrupt the established power dynamics between state and federal authorities.

Reactions from Both Sides

Following the appellate court’s decision, Trump expressed his satisfaction with a social media post that highlighted the urgent need for military presence in Los Angeles, framing it as an essential action for public safety. He noted that without military intervention, the city would have been in serious turmoil. On the opposing side, Newsom praised Judge Breyer’s initial ruling, asserting that it represented a significant check on executive power, denouncing the use of military forces in urban settings. Newsom used symbolic imagery in social media to emphasize the distinction between battlefield operations and city policing, aiming to instill a sense of responsibility regarding military deployment.

Implications of the Ruling

The implications of this legal battle extend beyond California, potentially setting a precedent for how future administrations might interact with state forces. If the Ninth Circuit ultimately sides with Judge Breyer, it could reinstate critical checks and balances in state-federal relations, especially regarding military involvement in civilian affairs. The ruling addresses larger concerns about presidential overreach and the militarization of urban environments, highlighted by Breyer’s assertion that Trump’s actions established a dangerous precedent. The upcoming hearing on Tuesday will play a pivotal role in shaping the trajectory of this legislative clash.

No. Key Points
1 The Ninth Circuit temporarily blocked a ruling requiring President Trump to return control of the National Guard to Governor Newsom.
2 Judge Breyer deemed Trump’s actions illegal and lacking necessary legal justification.
3 The federalization of troops was in response to protests against immigration enforcement in Los Angeles.
4 Both sides expressed their views on the ruling, highlighting tensions between state and federal powers.
5 Implications of this ruling could impact future interactions between state and federal authorities regarding military deployments.

Summary

In conclusion, the recent decision by the Ninth Circuit showcases a crucial moment in the ongoing debate concerning the extent of presidential authority over state resources. As the situation unfolds, the outcome of next week’s hearing could have lasting repercussions not only for California but also for the balance of power between federal and state governments throughout the United States.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What are the grounds for federalizing the National Guard?

Federalizing the National Guard typically requires conditions such as an invasion or rebellion, or when the president is unable to execute U.S. laws. Judge Breyer argued that the protests in Los Angeles did not meet these criteria.

Question: Why did Judge Breyer rule against President Trump?

Judge Breyer ruled against President Trump because he found that the federalization of the National Guard exceeded the president’s statutory authority and violated the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution.

Question: What were the reactions from Governor Newsom following the ruling?

Governor Newsom praised Judge Breyer’s ruling, describing it as a significant check on presidential power. He emphasized that military forces should not be deployed to city streets, framing the situation as a broader issue of executive overreach.

Appeals California Congress control Court Crime Economy Education Elections Environmental Issues Gains Guard Healthcare Immigration national Natural Disasters Politics Public Policy Ruling Social Issues Supreme Court Technology Trump White House
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp Copy Link Bluesky
News Editor
  • Website

As the News Editor at News Journos, I am dedicated to curating and delivering the latest and most impactful stories across business, finance, politics, technology, and global affairs. With a commitment to journalistic integrity, we provide breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert insights to keep our readers informed in an ever-changing world. News Journos is your go-to independent news source, ensuring fast, accurate, and reliable reporting on the topics that matter most.

Keep Reading

U.S. News

Apple’s F1 Achievement Overshadowed by AI Challenges

10 Mins Read
U.S. News

International LGBTQ+ Travelers Cut Back on U.S. Trips

7 Mins Read
U.S. News

iPhone Sales in China Rise for First Time in Two Years

5 Mins Read
U.S. News

IPO Market Revitalized as Circle’s 500% Surge Signals End of VC Drought

6 Mins Read
U.S. News

CoreWeave Achieves First Deployment of Nvidia’s Blackwell Ultra

5 Mins Read
U.S. News

Microsoft Lays Off 830 Employees in Washington State

6 Mins Read
Mr Serdar Avatar

Serdar Imren

News Director

Facebook Twitter Instagram
Journalism Under Siege
Editors Picks

U.S. Attorney Dismisses Case Against Newark Mayor, Charges Representative for ICE Protest

May 19, 2025

Trump administration keeps Biden merger review guidelines

February 19, 2025

Arson, Gunfire, and Vandalism Target Tesla Vehicles and Dealerships, FBI Reports

March 21, 2025

Trump Introduces Two New Tariffs on “Liberation Day” April 2

April 2, 2025

Democrats Split on Wisconsin Judge and Trump Impeachment Perspectives

April 25, 2025

Subscribe to News

Get the latest sports news from NewsSite about world, sports and politics.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest Vimeo WhatsApp TikTok Instagram

News

  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Money Watch

Journos

  • Top Stories
  • Turkey Reports
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Sports
  • Entertainment

COMPANY

  • About Us
  • Get In Touch
  • Our Authors
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Accessibility

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

© 2025 The News Journos. Designed by The News Journos.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.