Close Menu
News JournosNews Journos
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
Editors Picks

Trump Engages in Heated Exchange During Interview with ABC News Anchor

April 30, 2025

California Sues Trump to Halt Tariffs

April 16, 2025

Trump Envoy Discusses Lengthy Meeting with Putin in Moscow

February 23, 2025

Trump Finalizes $2 Trillion in Deals with Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Qatar

May 16, 2025

Federal Judge Bars Trump from Shuttering Agencies

May 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Latest Headlines:
  • U.S. to Revoke Immigration Status for Haitian Migrants in September
  • Minimum Wage Increases Coming in 15 States and Cities This July
  • Supreme Court Restricts Federal Judges’ Authority Over Presidential Orders
  • Natasha Cloud Backs Socialist Candidate Zohran Mamdani for NYC Mayor
  • WHO Report suggests COVID-19 origins may include zoonotic spillover and keeps lab leak theory under consideration
  • Three Factors Fuel Record Stock Week with Seven Portfolio Stocks Reaching New Highs
  • UVA President Resigns Amid Federal Investigation
  • China’s CATL Expands Global Presence, Impact on Battery Market Explored
  • 3.5 Tons of Cocaine Seized from ‘Narco Sub’ in Pacific Ocean Off Mexico
  • Luxury Doomsday Bunkers Set to Open in 2026 for Wealthy Clients
  • Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Parents Challenging Children’s Books on Gender Identity and Sexuality
  • AI-Generated Videos Spread Misinformation on Iran-Israel Conflict, Researchers Warn
  • Diddy’s Lawyer Calls Prosecution a “Fake Trial” in Closing Argument
  • Kılıçdaroğlu Urges Intellectuals to Challenge the Status Quo
  • Fenerbahçe Title Celebration Targeted by Transphobic Smear Campaign Amid Drag Performance
  • New York Advances Nuclear Power Plant Initiative to Achieve Clean Energy Targets
  • Norway’s Crown Princess Son Faces Rape and Sexual Assault Charges
  • Afghan Ally Detained by ICE Following Immigration Court Appearance
  • Families of French Prisoners in Iran Express Concerns Over Their Location
  • Democratic Donors Show Hesitation Toward Harris’ California Governor Campaign
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
News JournosNews Journos
Subscribe
Friday, June 27
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
News JournosNews Journos
You are here: News Journos » Politics » Trump Orders Deportation of Suspected Venezuelan Gang Members Under 1798 Alien Enemies Act
Trump Orders Deportation of Suspected Venezuelan Gang Members Under 1798 Alien Enemies Act

Trump Orders Deportation of Suspected Venezuelan Gang Members Under 1798 Alien Enemies Act

News EditorBy News EditorMarch 15, 2025 Politics 6 Mins Read

In a significant escalation of U.S. immigration policy, President Trump has invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, ordering the swift detention and deportation of Venezuelan migrants believed to be affiliated with the Tren de Aragua prison gang. This unprecedented measure characterizes the gang as a wartime adversary and seeks to transform legal proceedings for these migrants, bypassing traditional due process safeguards established in immigration law. However, shortly after the proclamation, a federal judge intervened, temporarily halting the deportations, emphasizing the potential harm such actions could impose on those affected.

Article Subheadings
1) President’s Directive and Legal Framework
2) Immediate Judicial Response
3) Historical Context of the Alien Enemies Act
4) Implications for Migrants and Legal Ramifications
5) Political Reactions and Future Considerations

President’s Directive and Legal Framework

On a recent Saturday, President Trump issued a proclamation invoking the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, marking a dramatic shift in American immigration enforcement. This law permits the U.S. government to detain and deport non-citizens identified as a potential threat during wartime. In his proclamation, Trump justified his actions by claiming that the Tren de Aragua gang is “perpetrating, attempting, and threatening an invasion or predatory incursion against the territory of the United States.” Under this legal premise, he directed the Departments of Homeland Security and Justice to apprehend and remove all Venezuelan migrants aged 14 and older alleged to be gang members but lacking U.S. citizenship or permanent residency.

According to Trump’s order, these individuals would be processed as enemy aliens, allowing the government to bypass standard legal protections afforded to migrants, including the chance to contest their deportation or seek asylum in court. The President viewed the actions of the Tren de Aragua as aligned with the Venezuelan government’s destabilizing agenda under President Nicolás Maduro, emphasizing the alleged threat this gang poses not only to national security but to public safety in general.

Immediate Judicial Response

However, the President’s decree met with swift resistance within the judicial system. In an emergency response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), U.S. District Judge James Boasberg granted a temporary restraining order preventing the deportation of any individuals covered under Trump’s proclamation. This legal decision was delivered swiftly, intervening to protect those in custody from being expelled. Judge Boasberg’s order requires that deportation flights already en route to remove these individuals should return to the United States.

The ACLU has hailed the judge’s ruling as a critical victory, underscoring their belief that Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act represents a radical departure from established law. Lee Gelernt, the lead attorney representing the plaintiffs, reinforced this perspective, stating,

“We are thrilled the judge recognized the severe harm our plaintiffs would face if removed,”

further asserting that the proclamation is fundamentally lawless. The legal battle continues as the temporary restraining order remains in place, indicating a significant pushback against the administration’s efforts to detain and deport Venezuelan migrants.

Historical Context of the Alien Enemies Act

The Alien Enemies Act, enacted in 1798, has a complicated historical legacy. Originally designed in a post-Revolution context, this law has only been invoked on a few notable occasions in U.S. history—primarily during the World Wars. In those instances, the act was used to surveil and detain foreign nationals from enemy nations such as Italy, Germany, and Japan. Using the Act to target individuals from countries with which the United States is not in active conflict presents a novel application that raises numerous legal and ethical questions.

No previous President has utilized the Alien Enemies Act to justify actions against migrants in this manner. By framing the Tren de Aragua gang as a non-state actor staging an “invasion,” Trump’s administration is taking a bold and controversial step not previously seen in the history of U.S. immigration law. This triggers discussions about the intent and scope of wartime laws, particularly as they apply to issues of immigration and public safety.

Implications for Migrants and Legal Ramifications

The implications of Trump’s directive are immediate and severe for affected Venezuelan migrants. Many of these individuals are escaping dire conditions in their home country, facing a plethora of challenges including poverty, violence, and political oppression. Their designation as enemy aliens erases many protections typically afforded to asylum seekers, essentially stripping them of their right to due process.

Critics are voicing concerns that equating non-citizens with wartime enemies sets a dangerous precedent. It invites a range of potential abuses—those seeking refuge could be left vulnerable to swift deportation without the opportunity to plead their cases. The ramifications for the rule of law in the eyes of migrants and advocates are profound. It brings forth critical discussions on human rights and the treatment of individuals seeking safety from violence and persecution.

Political Reactions and Future Considerations

The political reactions to Trump’s proclamation have been mixed. Proponents argue that the aggressive stance is necessary to maintain national security and public safety. They link the actions of gangs like Tren de Aragua to broader concerns about illegal immigration and crime rates in the U.S. Conversely, opponents, including various civil rights organizations and immigration advocates, frame the decision as an overreach of executive authority that militarizes immigration enforcement.

The ongoing legal challenges will likely shape future immigration policy discussions as the Biden administration prepares to approach these issues differently. As courts weigh the legality of Trump’s actions, the potential for appeals and prolonged legal battles remains high. Stakeholders will be closely watching how the situation develops, as the ramifications of this proclamation and its judicial challenges will have long-lasting effects on U.S. immigration policy and the treatment of vulnerable migrant populations.

No. Key Points
1 President Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act to detain and deport Venezuelan migrants linked to the Tren de Aragua gang.
2 A federal judge temporarily blocked the deportations, responding to an ACLU lawsuit.
3 The Alien Enemies Act has limited historical precedent and has never been used against migrants from non-warring nations.
4 Critics suggest that the proclamation undermines due process rights for migrants seeking refuge.
5 Political responses to the proclamation reveal a significant divide in perspectives on national security and civil rights.

Summary

The invocation of the Alien Enemies Act marks a pivotal moment in U.S. immigration policy, igniting debates over national security, civil rights, and the treatment of migrants. The ensuing legal challenges reflect a growing tension between executive authority and judicial oversight. As this situation develops, the implications for both current and future immigration policies will be crucial for a nation grappling with complex humanitarian issues.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What is the Alien Enemies Act?

The Alien Enemies Act is a law enacted in 1798 that allows the U.S. government to detain and deport non-citizens identified as threats during wartime.

Question: What were the consequences of President Trump’s proclamation?

The proclamation directed the detention and deportation of Venezuelan migrants linked to a prison gang, bypassing due process protections and leading to immediate legal challenges.

Question: How did the judiciary respond to the proclamation?

A federal judge granted a temporary restraining order that blocks the deportations, citing the potential harm it would cause to individuals in custody under the new policy.

Act Alien Bipartisan Negotiations Congressional Debates deportation Election Campaigns Enemies Executive Orders Federal Budget gang Healthcare Policy House of Representatives Immigration Reform Legislative Process Lobbying Activities members National Security orders Party Platforms Political Fundraising Presidential Agenda Public Policy Senate Hearings Supreme Court Decisions Suspected Tax Legislation Trump Venezuelan Voter Turnout
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp Copy Link Bluesky
News Editor
  • Website

As the News Editor at News Journos, I am dedicated to curating and delivering the latest and most impactful stories across business, finance, politics, technology, and global affairs. With a commitment to journalistic integrity, we provide breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert insights to keep our readers informed in an ever-changing world. News Journos is your go-to independent news source, ensuring fast, accurate, and reliable reporting on the topics that matter most.

Keep Reading

Politics

U.S. to Revoke Immigration Status for Haitian Migrants in September

5 Mins Read
Politics

Afghan Ally Detained by ICE Following Immigration Court Appearance

7 Mins Read
Politics

Supreme Court Restricts Judges’ Use of Nationwide Injunctions in Birthright Citizenship Case

6 Mins Read
Politics

Former Aide to Jill Biden Subpoenaed in House GOP Investigation into Biden’s Age

6 Mins Read
Politics

Climate Movement Files Landmark Class Action Lawsuit Against EPA

6 Mins Read
Politics

White House Confirms No Scheduled Meetings with Iran

4 Mins Read
Mr Serdar Avatar

Serdar Imren

News Director

Facebook Twitter Instagram
Journalism Under Siege
Editors Picks

GOP Delegation Examines Controversial El Salvador Prison for U.S. Deportees

April 17, 2025

Top Trump Official Unites House GOP Support for Tariff Plan

April 2, 2025

Former Immigration Chief Warns Migrant Terror Groups of Severe Consequences Under Trump

February 22, 2025

Veterans Urge Trump to Honor Marine War Hero Overlooked by Biden for Medal of Honor

February 23, 2025

Trump to Announce Tariff Deals, Assures No Upcoming Recession, Says Economic Advisor

April 14, 2025

Subscribe to News

Get the latest sports news from NewsSite about world, sports and politics.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest Vimeo WhatsApp TikTok Instagram

News

  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Money Watch

Journos

  • Top Stories
  • Turkey Reports
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Sports
  • Entertainment

COMPANY

  • About Us
  • Get In Touch
  • Our Authors
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Accessibility

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

© 2025 The News Journos. Designed by The News Journos.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.