Close Menu
News JournosNews Journos
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
Editors Picks

Trump Tariffs Raise Investor Concerns Ahead of “Liberation Day”

April 2, 2025

Trump Signs Executive Order to Accelerate Deep-Sea Mining Initiatives

April 25, 2025

Judge Blocks Trump Administration from Preventing International Student Enrollment at Harvard

June 20, 2025

Trump Signs Executive Order to Enhance Cost Efficiency for DOGE

February 26, 2025

Trump Advocates Raising Taxes on Wealthiest as ‘Good Politics’

May 10, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Latest Headlines:
  • AI Browsers More Vulnerable to Scams Than Humans, Study Finds
  • Cyberattack Disrupts Operations and Delays at Major European Airports
  • Memorial for Charlie Kirk Set for Sunday in Arizona, Featuring Erika Kirk as Speaker
  • Trump’s Proposed China TikTok Deal Faces Scrutiny
  • Landslide Warning Raises Alarm in Black Sea Region
  • Turkey Will Not Return Siloam Inscription to Israel, ErdoÄŸan Declares
  • Trump Administration Threatens Lawsuits and Funding Cuts Over Migrant Detention in Democratic States
  • U.S. TikTok Future Depends on Algorithm Control
  • Music Legend Sonny Curtis Reflects on Career from Buddy Holly to Mary Tyler Moore
  • Trump Administration Proposes $100,000 Fee Increase for H-1B Visas
  • Thousands Evacuated in Hong Kong Due to Discovery of WWII Bomb
  • Violence Erupts at Right-Wing Demonstration in Netherlands Before Election
  • Germany’s Role as Europe’s Growth Driver in Doubt, Economists Say
  • Trump’s H-1B Visa Policy and Its Impact on Tech Companies and Foreign Governments
  • Warehouse Clubs Expand Presence with New Stores and Membership Growth
  • California GovernorSigns Law Prohibiting Law Enforcement from Wearing Face Coverings
  • Man Charged with Weapon Possession at Memorial Event for Charlie Kirk was Security Staff
  • Guide to Converting Files to PDF on Windows, Mac, iPhone, and Android
  • Russian Fighter Jets Intrude on Estonian Airspace for 12 Minutes, Officials Remark on Boldness
  • Adam Carolla Supports Jimmy Kimmel Following ABC Suspension of Late-Night Show
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
News JournosNews Journos
Subscribe
Sunday, September 21
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
News JournosNews Journos
You are here: News Journos » U.S. News » Trump Threatens to Withhold Federal Payments
Trump Threatens to Withhold Federal Payments

Trump Threatens to Withhold Federal Payments

News EditorBy News EditorJune 29, 2025 U.S. News 6 Mins Read

In a move to counteract federal funding cuts initiated by the Trump administration, Democratic lawmakers in primarily blue states are proposing innovative legislation. These bills would essentially enable states to withhold federal payments in response to unreleased or withheld federal funds. Legislation has already been introduced in Connecticut, Maryland, New York, and Wisconsin, with plans for similar bills in Washington State. While the proposals present a bold approach to federal-state relations, legal experts warn of significant hurdles ahead.

Article Subheadings
1) Overview of Proposed Legislation
2) The Motivations Behind the Bills
3) Legal Challenges and Considerations
4) Political Dynamics in Affected States
5) The Future of Federal-State Relations

Overview of Proposed Legislation

Democratic lawmakers in states like Connecticut, Maryland, New York, and Wisconsin have introduced novel bills aimed at counteracting the Trump administration’s directives concerning federal funding. This legislation proposes that states have the authority to withhold payments owed to the federal government if it has failed to release funds that had been approved by Congress. This would involve actions such as delaying federal tax payments collected from state employees, or withholding payments for other federal programs unless the government fulfills its funding obligations.

For instance, bills introduced in Wisconsin would specifically target withheld funds that are vital for state programs, including child care and agriculture support. State officials argue that such measures are necessary to protect local residents from the fallout of federal funding cuts. The responses from the federal government are largely anticipated but not asserted, leaving room for speculation about enforcement and legal implications.

The Motivations Behind the Bills

The impetus behind these legislative proposals stems from frustration with the Trump administration’s handling of federal funding—considered overreaching and arbitrary by state-level Democrats. David Moon, the Democratic majority leader in Maryland’s House of Delegates, articulated that the withholding of funds could have severe consequences for state residents: “Without these funds, we are going to see Maryland residents severely harmed.”

Lawmakers express concerns about how these federal funding cuts disproportionately impact programs essential for health care, food assistance, and environmental protections. By introducing bills that allow the states to take a stand against what they see as an illegal withholding of funds by the federal government, they hope to create legal frameworks for accountability. The underlying message is that states no longer wish to be passive recipients of federal decisions that undercut their own governance and responsibilities to their citizens.

Legal Challenges and Considerations

However, legal experts warn that these groundbreaking bills will face substantial obstacles if they progress through state legislatures. The U.S. Constitution’s supremacy clause clearly states that federal law takes precedence over state law, which raises questions about the viability of such state initiatives. Additionally, even if these bills were enacted, they would likely invite legal challenges that could tie them up in the courts for extended periods, thus undermining their immediate effectiveness.

Moreover, some experts argue that the federal government has substantially more financial leverage than states when it comes to funding. David Super, a professor specializing in administrative and constitutional law, noted, “Withholding state payments to the federal government… isn’t likely to change very much.” Such legal complications could deter states from pursuing this course of action, particularly if they risk losing critical federal funding altogether, which is often essential for various local programs.

Political Dynamics in Affected States

The political landscape in each of the states considering such bills will also play a critical role in their progression. In Wisconsin, for example, although Democrats are pushing for these proposals, the Republican-controlled legislature presents significant challenges to their implementation. This is contrasted in states like Maryland and Connecticut, where Democratic incumbents hold substantial power within both the legislature and the executive branch, potentially allowing for a more favorable context for the bills.

The dynamic varies in Washington State, where there exists a desire to introduce similar measures. State Sen. Manka Dhingra believes that the current climate presents unique opportunities for states to assert their rights, especially given the circumstances of funding decisions made at the federal level. However, the potential for retaliation from the Trump administration is a concern echoed by many state legislators. David Moon acknowledged the power disparity between state and federal government in budget negotiations, cautioning that the risks of pushback from the federal level cannot be overlooked.

The Future of Federal-State Relations

Looking forward, these legislative initiatives could mark a significant shift in state-federal relations, particularly under a framework where state governments feel empowered to take action against perceived injustices in federal oversight. However, broader implications remain to be seen, as these actions may set precedence for how states interact with federal entities moving forward.

For advocates of state rights, these bills represent a clarion call for self-governance and autonomy against federal intrusion. If successful, they could pave the way for a more robust dialogue about the distribution of power between state and federal governments. However, the road ahead will require careful navigation of both legal challenges and political realities that could shape the outcomes significantly.

No. Key Points
1 Democratic legislators in blue states are introducing bills to combat federal funding cuts.
2 Bills aim to allow states to withhold federal tax payments in response to funding cuts.
3 Legal experts caution about the potential hurdles these bills face based on constitutional principles.
4 Political dynamics vary by state, affecting the chances of legislative success.
5 The proposed measures may reshape federal-state relations over time, pushing for local autonomy.

Summary

The recent wave of proposed legislation by Democratic lawmakers illustrates a growing momentum to resist federal funding cuts that are seen as detrimental to state welfare. While these measures are bold attempts to assert state rights and self-governance, they are entering a complex legal and political environment that could impede their progress. The outcomes of these initiatives will be vital in determining how states can effectively respond to federal policies in the future and what this means for the balance of power within the federal system.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What are the proposed bills aiming to achieve?

The proposed bills aim to allow states to withhold federal payments in response to missed funding obligations from the federal government.

Question: Which states are currently introducing these measures?

Connecticut, Maryland, New York, and Wisconsin are among the states that have introduced these bills, with Washington State also planning to draft similar legislation.

Question: What legal challenges do these bills face?

The bills may encounter significant legal hurdles related to the U.S. Constitution’s supremacy clause, which prioritizes federal law over state law, potentially complicating the implementation of such laws.

Congress Crime Economy Education Elections Environmental Issues federal Healthcare Immigration Natural Disasters Payments Politics Public Policy Social Issues Supreme Court Technology Threatens Trump White House Withhold
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp Copy Link Bluesky
News Editor
  • Website

As the News Editor at News Journos, I am dedicated to curating and delivering the latest and most impactful stories across business, finance, politics, technology, and global affairs. With a commitment to journalistic integrity, we provide breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert insights to keep our readers informed in an ever-changing world. News Journos is your go-to independent news source, ensuring fast, accurate, and reliable reporting on the topics that matter most.

Keep Reading

U.S. News

Trump’s Proposed China TikTok Deal Faces Scrutiny

6 Mins Read
U.S. News

Man Charged with Weapon Possession at Memorial Event for Charlie Kirk was Security Staff

6 Mins Read
U.S. News

Cruz Compares FCC Chair to Mafia Boss in Kimmel Debate Over Censorship

7 Mins Read
U.S. News

Evidence in Burning Man Murder Case Includes Green Knife

6 Mins Read
U.S. News

Colbert Backs Kimmel, Labels Trump an Autocrat

6 Mins Read
U.S. News

Witnesses Describe Ride to Hospital After Assassination Attempt on Charlie Kirk

7 Mins Read
Journalism Under Siege
Editors Picks

Judge Halts Trump Administration’s Passport Policy Discriminating Against Transgender Individuals

June 18, 2025

Signal Faces Challenges as Trump Administration Supports National Security Advisor

April 4, 2025

Senate Democrats Unite Against Crypto Legislation Amid Concerns Over Trump Influence

May 6, 2025

Boulder Attack Raises Concerns Over Rising Antisemitic Violence in the U.S.

June 3, 2025

Pressure on Dollar Dominance and Its Implications for the U.S.

March 29, 2025

Subscribe to News

Get the latest sports news from NewsSite about world, sports and politics.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest Vimeo WhatsApp TikTok Instagram

News

  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Money Watch

Journos

  • Top Stories
  • Turkey Reports
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Sports
  • Entertainment

COMPANY

  • About Us
  • Get In Touch
  • Our Authors
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Accessibility

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

© 2025 The News Journos. Designed by The News Journos.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.
Go to mobile version