Close Menu
News JournosNews Journos
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
Editors Picks

Trump Declines to Answer on Due Process Rights When Questioned

May 4, 2025

Trump Criticizes “Too Many Non-Working Holidays” on Juneteenth

June 19, 2025

Dems Criticize Elon Musk and Melania Trump for Xenophobic Remarks

April 5, 2025

Supreme Court to Decide on DOGE Access to Social Security Administration Systems Amid Trump Administration Request

May 3, 2025

Trump Administration Urges 500,000 Immigrants to Self-Deport

June 12, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Latest Headlines:
  • Nine Hidden Online Privacy Risks You Should Be Aware Of
  • Premarket Stock Movers: META, MRNA, HPE, JNPR
  • Trump Administration Alleges Harvard Violated Civil Rights Law Regarding Jewish Students
  • UK High Court Dismisses Challenge to Military Parts Sales to Israel
  • Charlize Theron Critiques Jeff Bezos’ Wedding as Celebrities Support Ex-Wife
  • Reza Pahlavi Urges U.S. Support for Iranians Pursuing Regime Change
  • Nearly 150,000 Pounds of Bologna Recalled Over Undeclared Meat Sources
  • New WNBA Teams Set to Launch in Cleveland, Detroit, and Philadelphia
  • Mansur Yavaş Calls for Rejection of Congress Case
  • Passenger in India Arrested for Carrying 16 Live Snakes, Including Rhino Rat Snake, in Luggage
  • Three Arrested Following İstanbul Pride March Incident
  • Iran Confirms 71 Deaths in Israeli Strike on Evin Prison
  • Rival Chain Surpasses KFC to Claim No. 3 Spot in Chicken Market
  • Cartel Hired Hacker to Target FBI Informants Using Surveillance Tech, U.S. Officials Report
  • Moderna’s Flu Vaccine Trials Show Promise for Combined Shot Development
  • Suspect Arrested in Livestreamed Murder of Venezuelan TikTok Influencer Who Criticized Gang
  • HHS Cuts CDC Staff Responsible for Birth Control Safety Oversight
  • Canada and U.S. Revive Trade Talks Following Withdrawal of Tech Tax Plan
  • Lawyer Criticizes Mountain West for Handling of Transgender Volleyball Player Inquiry
  • Analysts Caution Iran’s Nuclear Ambitions Persist Despite Site Destruction
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
News JournosNews Journos
Subscribe
Monday, June 30
  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Turkey Reports
  • Money Watch
  • Health
News JournosNews Journos
You are here: News Journos » Politics » US Naval Academy Discontinues Affirmative Action in Admissions
US Naval Academy Discontinues Affirmative Action in Admissions

US Naval Academy Discontinues Affirmative Action in Admissions

News EditorBy News EditorMarch 29, 2025 Politics 6 Mins Read

A recent ruling from a U.S. Court of Appeals has significant implications for the admissions process at the U.S. Naval Academy (USNA) in Annapolis, Maryland. The appellate court’s decision mandates that the academy eliminate the consideration of race, ethnicity, or sex in its admissions criteria, following directives set forth by former President Donald Trump. This change has sparked debate among various stakeholders including government officials, military leaders, and advocacy groups.

Article Subheadings
1) Legal Ruling Overturns Previous Policy
2) Implications of Trump’s Executive Order
3) Overview of the Appeals Process
4) Reactions from Officials and Advocacy Groups
5) Future Directions for the Naval Academy

Legal Ruling Overturns Previous Policy

The Court of Appeals’ ruling, articulated on February 14, reaffirms a shift in the admissions policy at the U.S. Naval Academy that has stirred considerable controversy. Under Vice Adm. Yvette Davids, the academy must now explicitly refrain from factoring in race, ethnicity, or sex at any stage of the admissions process. This ruling comes on the heels of a previous decision in December, which permitted the consideration of these factors, albeit temporarily. The legal backdrop stems from an appeal led by the organization Students for Fair Admissions, which contends that race-based admissions policies are discriminatory and violate legal principles.

The court filing, made public by the Department of Justice (DOJ) on a Friday, noted that this directive from the appellate court enforces a stricter standard for military academies, which are under the unique jurisdiction of national security laws. The judges emphasized that “military cohesion and other national security factors” should distinguish the policies governing military schools from those affecting civilian universities.

Implications of Trump’s Executive Order

Former President Trump’s executive order issued on January 27 demanded that all branches of the Armed Forces operate free from any preferences based on race or sex. This order called for a thorough internal review of service academies, leading to an abrupt halt of programs and offices focused on Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) within the Naval Academy. The maneuvers undertaken by the USNA are reflective of broader national policies that aim to reshape military admissions standards in light of these guidelines.

The naval establishment justified this policy modification by bolstering arguments that prioritizing diversity can impact military effectiveness. Despite this, many critics argue that the sudden transformation could undermine decades of progress in achieving a more diverse military force, potentially dissuading candidates from underrepresented backgrounds.

Overview of the Appeals Process

Students for Fair Admissions, which represents a collective of individuals opposed to affirmative action, played a critical role in challenging the Naval Academy’s admissions practices. By appealing to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, they included arguments rooted in claims of fairness, asserting that racial considerations in college admissions practices are both “unfair and illegal.” The DOJ’s recent request for a suspension of the case highlights the need for thorough review and negotiation regarding the new policies established at USNA.

In a remarkable turn of events, the appellate court’s decision followed a complex set of earlier court rulings that had allowed race to influence admissions decisions temporarily. The significance of the appellate verdict lies in its potential to reshape how military academies across the nation develop their admissions frameworks, with implications that extend to other educational institutions as well.

Reactions from Officials and Advocacy Groups

The ruling has elicited mixed responses from various stakeholders. Advocacy groups, including Students for Fair Admissions, have praised the decision, with President Edward Blum asserting that the disbandment of race-based admissions serves justice by eliminating discrimination. He declared that “racial discrimination is wrong and racial classifications” should have no place at military academies.

Conversely, figures like Maryland Rep. Sarah Elfreth, who sits on the USNA’s Board of Visitors, condemned the decision as “disastrous,” warning that it “will have negative implications on our military’s recruitment and retention for decades to come.” Elfreth argues that a diverse military is indispensable for effective national security and readiness, suggesting the ruling could compromise these outcomes in the long run.

Future Directions for the Naval Academy

Going forward, the U.S. Naval Academy faces a pivotal juncture in terms of shaping its admissions policies and maintaining the support of a diverse candidate pool. As the institution shifts its focus away from diversity-based considerations, it must also ensure that its military force remains a reflection of the nation’s demographics. In February, the academy’s administration announced steps to close all DEIA offices, marking a clear alignment with Trump’s executive orders while seeking advice on how to maintain a diverse military landscape.

Future conversations will need to address both the realities of national security needs and the importance of representation within military ranks. As the legal and administrative frameworks around admissions evolve, the USNA must navigate the delicate balance between compliance and ethical accountability to foster a military that reflects the diversity of the United States.

No. Key Points
1 The U.S. Naval Academy is prohibited from considering race, ethnicity, or sex in admissions following a recent Court of Appeals ruling.
2 This decision aligns with an executive order issued by former President Trump aimed at eliminating preferences based on race or sex in military admissions.
3 Students for Fair Admissions is the group challenging the affirmative action policies in military educational institutions.
4 Reactions to the ruling include support from advocacy groups and criticism from military officials citing negative ramifications on diversity and cohesion in the armed forces.
5 The Naval Academy must now explore avenues to maintain diversity and meet recruitment goals in light of these new policies.

Summary

The recent ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals regarding the admissions process at the U.S. Naval Academy represents a pivotal moment in the ongoing discussion about race and diversity in military education. As the academy pivots from considering race, ethnicity, and sex in admissions, the implications for military cohesion, representation, and effectiveness will be closely scrutinized. The future trajectory will depend on navigating a balance that maintains military readiness while adhering to directives emerging from the highest levels of government.

Frequently Asked Questions

Question: What prompted the change in admissions policy at the U.S. Naval Academy?

The change was prompted by a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals which required the academy to halt the consideration of race, ethnicity, or sex in its admissions process, aligning with an executive order from former President Trump.

Question: Who is challenging the affirmative action policies at military academies?

The group Students for Fair Admissions is leading the challenge against affirmative action policies, arguing that such practices are discriminatory and violate legal principles.

Question: What are the potential implications of the ruling on military diversity?

Critics of the ruling argue it could reduce the diversity of the military, affecting recruitment and retention processes, and potentially compromising national security by not adequately representing the demographics of the U.S. population.

Academy action Admissions Affirmative Bipartisan Negotiations Congressional Debates Discontinues Election Campaigns Executive Orders Federal Budget Healthcare Policy House of Representatives Immigration Reform Legislative Process Lobbying Activities National Security Naval Party Platforms Political Fundraising Presidential Agenda Public Policy Senate Hearings Supreme Court Decisions Tax Legislation Voter Turnout
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Email Reddit WhatsApp Copy Link Bluesky
News Editor
  • Website

As the News Editor at News Journos, I am dedicated to curating and delivering the latest and most impactful stories across business, finance, politics, technology, and global affairs. With a commitment to journalistic integrity, we provide breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert insights to keep our readers informed in an ever-changing world. News Journos is your go-to independent news source, ensuring fast, accurate, and reliable reporting on the topics that matter most.

Keep Reading

Politics

Trump Administration Alleges Harvard Violated Civil Rights Law Regarding Jewish Students

6 Mins Read
Politics

HHS Cuts CDC Staff Responsible for Birth Control Safety Oversight

6 Mins Read
Politics

Key Insights from June 29, 2025, ‘Face the Nation’ Episode

7 Mins Read
Politics

Justice Department Commits to Address Surge in Attacks on Religious Facilities

6 Mins Read
Politics

Sen. Warner Urges Vigilance Against Political Pressure in Higher Education

5 Mins Read
Politics

Sen. Thom Tillis Declines Reelection Amid Trump-Driven Primary Threat

4 Mins Read
Mr Serdar Avatar

Serdar Imren

News Director

Facebook Twitter Instagram
Journalism Under Siege
Editors Picks

Trump Teases Support for Critic’s 2026 Senate Challenge to Flip Democratic Seat

April 7, 2025

Donald Trump Jr. Emerges as Influential Figure in Washington

May 15, 2025

Trump Open to Releasing Reports on Assassination Attempts

March 6, 2025

Sister of Vanessa Guillén Considers Challenge to Rep. Al Green After Trump Remarks

March 13, 2025

Acosta: Half of Americans Want Truth About Trump

April 18, 2025

Subscribe to News

Get the latest sports news from NewsSite about world, sports and politics.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest Vimeo WhatsApp TikTok Instagram

News

  • World
  • U.S. News
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Europe News
  • Finance
  • Money Watch

Journos

  • Top Stories
  • Turkey Reports
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Sports
  • Entertainment

COMPANY

  • About Us
  • Get In Touch
  • Our Authors
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Accessibility

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

© 2025 The News Journos. Designed by The News Journos.

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.